JP Kaltapau betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 24 | 411 | 426 | 24.2 | 96.5 | 8.2 | 41.8 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 24 | 51 | 1 | 12.8 | 51.0 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where JP Kaltapau scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Venue: Independence Park, Port Vila (T20)MEDIUM sample
159 runs off 149 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 106.7 vs 96.5 overall, average 39.8 vs 24.2 overall.
- Venue: Faleata Oval No 2, Apia (T20)MEDIUM sample
133 runs off 125 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 106.4 vs 96.5 overall, average 44.3 vs 24.2 overall.
- Opposition: Samoa (T20)LOW sample
118 runs off 111 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 106.3 vs 96.5 overall, average 59.0 vs 24.2 overall.
- Opposition: Cook Islands (T20)LOW sample
122 runs off 105 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 116.2 vs 96.5 overall, average 30.5 vs 24.2 overall.
- Opposition: Fiji (T20)LOW sample
91 runs off 83 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 109.6 vs 96.5 overall, average 45.5 vs 24.2 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample
101 runs off 95 balls in 13 T20 matches — strike rate 106.3 vs 96.5 overall, average 25.3 vs 24.2 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)LOW sample
96 runs off 119 balls in 13 T20 matches — strike rate 80.7 vs 96.5 overall, average 48.0 vs 24.2 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Samoa | T20 | 5 | 118 | 111 | 59.0 | 106.3 | 9.9 | 40.5 | LOW |
| Cook Islands | T20 | 5 | 122 | 105 | 30.5 | 116.2 | 10.5 | 32.4 | LOW |
| Fiji | T20 | 3 | 91 | 83 | 45.5 | 109.6 | 9.6 | 32.5 | LOW |
| Japan | T20 | 2 | 44 | 51 | 44.0 | 86.3 | 5.9 | 45.1 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Independence Park, Port Vila | T20 | 5 | 159 | 149 | 39.8 | 106.7 | 10.7 | 38.9 | MEDIUM |
| Faleata Oval No 2, Apia | T20 | 6 | 133 | 125 | 44.3 | 106.4 | 8.0 | 33.6 | MEDIUM |
| Amini Park, Port Moresby | T20 | 4 | 21 | 50 | 5.3 | 42.0 | 0.0 | 66.0 | LOW |
| Sano International Cricket Ground | T20 | 4 | 48 | 44 | 24.0 | 109.1 | 9.1 | 38.6 | LOW |
| Korogi Sports Park, Nisshin | T20 | 1 | 37 | 38 | — | 97.4 | 7.9 | 39.5 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 20 | 363 | 382 | 24.2 | 95.0 | 8.1 | 42.1 | HIGH |
| Japan | T20 | 4 | 48 | 44 | 24.0 | 109.1 | 9.1 | 38.6 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 22 | 225 | 231 | 17.3 | 97.4 | 7.8 | 38.1 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 13 | 96 | 119 | 48.0 | 80.7 | 8.4 | 55.5 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 7 | 90 | 76 | 45.0 | 118.4 | 9.2 | 31.6 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 21 | 163 | 179 | 16.3 | 91.1 | 7.8 | 44.7 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | T20 | 18 | 147 | 152 | 49.0 | 96.7 | 7.9 | 42.1 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 13 | 101 | 95 | 25.3 | 106.3 | 9.5 | 35.8 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.