JW Jenner betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 32 | 853 | 525 | 34.1 | 162.5 | 21.3 | 29.7 | HIGH |
| overall | ODI | 4 | 119 | 170 | 29.8 | 70.0 | 5.3 | 55.9 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where JW Jenner scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)MEDIUM sample
246 runs off 137 balls in 18 T20 matches — strike rate 179.6 vs 162.5 overall, average 49.2 vs 34.1 overall.
- Opposition: Namibia (ODI)LOW sample
76 runs off 96 balls in 1 ODI match — strike rate 79.2 vs 70.0 overall, average 76.0 vs 29.8 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (ODI)LOW sample
78 runs off 96 balls in 3 ODI matches — strike rate 81.3 vs 70.0 overall, average 26.0 vs 29.8 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)LOW sample
117 runs off 60 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 195.0 vs 162.5 overall, average 23.4 vs 34.1 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: middle (T20)HIGH sample
490 runs off 328 balls in 26 T20 matches — strike rate 149.4 vs 162.5 overall, average 32.7 vs 34.1 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
403 runs off 273 balls in 27 T20 matches — strike rate 147.6 vs 162.5 overall, average 33.6 vs 34.1 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Guernsey | T20 | 9 | 252 | 162 | 36.0 | 155.6 | 19.8 | 29.0 | MEDIUM |
| Namibia | ODI | 1 | 76 | 96 | 76.0 | 79.2 | 7.3 | 53.1 | LOW |
| Denmark | T20 | 3 | 78 | 51 | 26.0 | 152.9 | 17.6 | 29.4 | LOW |
| Spain | T20 | 2 | 81 | 51 | 40.5 | 158.8 | 19.6 | 29.4 | LOW |
| United Arab Emirates | ODI | 1 | 32 | 46 | 32.0 | 69.6 | 2.2 | 50.0 | LOW |
| Scotland | T20 | 2 | 41 | 33 | 20.5 | 124.2 | 18.2 | 36.4 | LOW |
| Uganda | T20 | 1 | 27 | 31 | — | 87.1 | 3.2 | 35.5 | LOW |
| Switzerland | T20 | 1 | 67 | 30 | 67.0 | 223.3 | 33.3 | 23.3 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Wanderers Cricket Ground, Windhoek | ODI | 2 | 108 | 142 | 54.0 | 76.1 | 5.6 | 52.1 | MEDIUM |
| Grange Cricket Club Ground, Raeburn Place, Edinburgh | T20 | 3 | 104 | 57 | 52.0 | 182.5 | 29.8 | 36.8 | LOW |
| Sportpark Westvliet, Voorburg | T20 | 3 | 87 | 57 | 29.0 | 152.6 | 19.3 | 28.1 | LOW |
| King George V Sports Ground, Castel | T20 | 2 | 115 | 55 | 115.0 | 209.1 | 30.9 | 20.0 | LOW |
| La Manga Club Top Ground | T20 | 2 | 81 | 51 | 40.5 | 158.8 | 19.6 | 29.4 | LOW |
| Happy Valley Ground 2 | T20 | 3 | 89 | 47 | 44.5 | 189.4 | 23.4 | 23.4 | LOW |
| Bayer Uerdingen Cricket Ground | T20 | 4 | 98 | 45 | 24.5 | 217.8 | 31.1 | 26.7 | LOW |
| Svanholm Park, Brondby | T20 | 2 | 68 | 41 | 34.0 | 165.9 | 19.5 | 24.4 | LOW |
| Grainville, St Saviour | T20 | 3 | 44 | 39 | 22.0 | 112.8 | 10.3 | 30.8 | LOW |
| Queens Sports Club, Bulawayo | T20 | 2 | 30 | 37 | 30.0 | 81.1 | 2.7 | 37.8 | LOW |
| Goldenacre, Edinburgh | T20 | 3 | 34 | 33 | 11.3 | 103.0 | 9.1 | 45.5 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 32 | 853 | 525 | 34.1 | 162.5 | 21.3 | 29.7 | HIGH |
| Unknown | ODI | 4 | 119 | 170 | 29.8 | 70.0 | 5.3 | 55.9 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 26 | 490 | 328 | 32.7 | 149.4 | 16.5 | 28.7 | HIGH |
| middle | ODI | 3 | 110 | 152 | 55.0 | 72.4 | 5.3 | 54.6 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 18 | 246 | 137 | 49.2 | 179.6 | 30.7 | 34.3 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 8 | 117 | 60 | 23.4 | 195.0 | 26.7 | 25.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 27 | 403 | 273 | 33.6 | 147.6 | 17.2 | 31.5 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | T20 | 27 | 322 | 196 | 26.8 | 164.3 | 23.0 | 30.6 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | ODI | 3 | 78 | 96 | 26.0 | 81.3 | 7.3 | 54.2 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 11 | 128 | 56 | 128.0 | 228.6 | 35.7 | 17.9 | LOW |
| PACE | ODI | 4 | 22 | 48 | 22.0 | 45.8 | 2.1 | 62.5 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.