K Krishnakumar betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 14 | 324 | 265 | 24.9 | 122.3 | 12.8 | 40.8 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where K Krishnakumar scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
172 runs off 153 balls in 11 T20 matches — strike rate 112.4 vs 122.3 overall, average 43.0 vs 24.9 overall.
- Venue: Tikkurila Cricket Ground (T20)LOW sample
138 runs off 103 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 134.0 vs 122.3 overall, average 34.5 vs 24.9 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)LOW sample
109 runs off 61 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 178.7 vs 122.3 overall, average 27.3 vs 24.9 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
188 runs off 181 balls in 14 T20 matches — strike rate 103.9 vs 122.3 overall, average 20.9 vs 24.9 overall.
- Opposition: Cyprus (T20)LOW sample
75 runs off 77 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 97.4 vs 122.3 overall, average 25.0 vs 24.9 overall.
- Opposition: Romania (T20)LOW sample
72 runs off 64 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 112.5 vs 122.3 overall, average 18.0 vs 24.9 overall.
- Venue: Happy Valley Ground 2 (T20)LOW sample
92 runs off 87 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 105.7 vs 122.3 overall, average 23.0 vs 24.9 overall.
- Venue: Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County (T20)LOW sample
72 runs off 64 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 112.5 vs 122.3 overall, average 18.0 vs 24.9 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)LOW sample
58 runs off 60 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 96.7 vs 122.3 overall, average 19.3 vs 24.9 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Cyprus | T20 | 4 | 75 | 77 | 25.0 | 97.4 | 9.1 | 42.9 | LOW |
| Romania | T20 | 4 | 72 | 64 | 18.0 | 112.5 | 10.9 | 40.6 | LOW |
| Czech Republic | T20 | 1 | 77 | 49 | 77.0 | 157.1 | 18.4 | 32.7 | LOW |
| Finland | T20 | 1 | 48 | 34 | 48.0 | 141.2 | 17.6 | 47.1 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Tikkurila Cricket Ground | T20 | 4 | 138 | 103 | 34.5 | 134.0 | 15.5 | 42.7 | LOW |
| Happy Valley Ground 2 | T20 | 5 | 92 | 87 | 23.0 | 105.7 | 10.3 | 41.4 | LOW |
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 4 | 72 | 64 | 18.0 | 112.5 | 10.9 | 40.6 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 14 | 324 | 265 | 24.9 | 122.3 | 12.8 | 40.8 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 11 | 172 | 153 | 43.0 | 112.4 | 9.2 | 36.6 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 9 | 58 | 60 | 19.3 | 96.7 | 11.7 | 56.7 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 6 | 94 | 52 | 15.7 | 180.8 | 25.0 | 34.6 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 14 | 188 | 181 | 20.9 | 103.9 | 9.9 | 46.4 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 8 | 109 | 61 | 27.3 | 178.7 | 24.6 | 29.5 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.