K Oala betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 17 | 364 | 302 | 22.8 | 120.5 | 19.9 | 52.0 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 12 | 17 | 0 | 8.5 | — | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where K Oala scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Philippines (T20)LOW sample
124 runs off 64 balls in 1 T20 match — strike rate 193.8 vs 120.5 overall, not yet dismissed vs 22.8 overall.
- Venue: Albert Park 1, Suva (T20)LOW sample
145 runs off 80 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 181.3 vs 120.5 overall, average 72.5 vs 22.8 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)LOW sample
113 runs off 75 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 150.7 vs 120.5 overall, average 37.7 vs 22.8 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
189 runs off 171 balls in 15 T20 matches — strike rate 110.5 vs 120.5 overall, average 18.9 vs 22.8 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)MEDIUM sample
206 runs off 202 balls in 17 T20 matches — strike rate 102.0 vs 120.5 overall, average 17.2 vs 22.8 overall.
- Venue: Mulpani Cricket Ground (T20)LOW sample
77 runs off 71 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 108.5 vs 120.5 overall, average 25.7 vs 22.8 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Philippines | T20 | 1 | 124 | 64 | — | 193.8 | 37.5 | 34.4 | LOW |
| Thailand | T20 | 3 | 36 | 45 | 12.0 | 80.0 | 11.1 | 66.7 | LOW |
| Japan | T20 | 1 | 50 | 39 | 50.0 | 128.2 | 20.5 | 51.3 | LOW |
| United States of America | T20 | 1 | 41 | 39 | 41.0 | 105.1 | 7.7 | 30.8 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Albert Park 1, Suva | T20 | 3 | 145 | 80 | 72.5 | 181.3 | 35.0 | 37.5 | LOW |
| Mulpani Cricket Ground | T20 | 3 | 77 | 71 | 25.7 | 108.5 | 14.1 | 43.7 | LOW |
| Terdthai Cricket Ground, Bangkok | T20 | 4 | 37 | 50 | 9.3 | 74.0 | 12.0 | 72.0 | LOW |
| Albert Park 2, Suva | T20 | 2 | 62 | 49 | 31.0 | 126.5 | 20.4 | 51.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 17 | 364 | 302 | 22.8 | 120.5 | 19.9 | 52.0 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 17 | 206 | 202 | 17.2 | 102.0 | 18.3 | 62.9 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 5 | 113 | 75 | 37.7 | 150.7 | 21.3 | 36.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 15 | 189 | 171 | 18.9 | 110.5 | 20.5 | 59.6 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 11 | 144 | 114 | 24.0 | 126.3 | 17.5 | 43.9 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.