K Sequiera betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 7 | 157 | 148 | 31.4 | 106.1 | 8.8 | 33.1 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 162 | 145 | 2 | 5.4 | 72.5 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where K Sequiera scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Belgium (T20)LOW sample
87 runs off 69 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 126.1 vs 106.1 overall, average 43.5 vs 31.4 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
No split is materially below their own format baseline.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Belgium | T20 | 3 | 87 | 69 | 43.5 | 126.1 | 11.6 | 29.0 | LOW |
| Czech Republic | T20 | 3 | 33 | 40 | 11.0 | 82.5 | 5.0 | 40.0 | LOW |
| Norway | T20 | 1 | 37 | 39 | — | 94.9 | 7.7 | 33.3 | LOW |
Bowling
| Belgium | T20 | 66 | 65 | 1 | 5.9 | 65.0 | LOW |
| Norway | T20 | 66 | 53 | 1 | 4.8 | 53.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Scott Page Field, Vinor | T20 | 6 | 120 | 109 | 24.0 | 110.1 | 9.2 | 33.0 | LOW |
| Santarem Cricket Ground | T20 | 1 | 37 | 39 | — | 94.9 | 7.7 | 33.3 | LOW |
Bowling
| Scott Page Field, Vinor | T20 | 96 | 92 | 1 | 5.8 | 92.0 | LOW |
| Santarem Cricket Ground | T20 | 66 | 53 | 1 | 4.8 | 53.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 7 | 157 | 148 | 31.4 | 106.1 | 8.8 | 33.1 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 162 | 145 | 2 | 5.4 | 72.5 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 5 | 72 | 68 | 72.0 | 105.9 | 5.9 | 25.0 | LOW |
| middle | T20 | 6 | 45 | 45 | 15.0 | 100.0 | 8.9 | 40.0 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 2 | 40 | 35 | 40.0 | 114.3 | 14.3 | 40.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 120 | 111 | 1 | 5.6 | 111.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 7 | 99 | 94 | 24.8 | 105.3 | 10.6 | 36.2 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 4 | 40 | 38 | 40.0 | 105.3 | 5.3 | 31.6 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.