K Vijayaraghavan betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 28 | 269 | 444 | 12.8 | 60.6 | 4.1 | 56.5 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where K Vijayaraghavan scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
151 runs off 214 balls in 24 T20 matches — strike rate 70.6 vs 60.6 overall, average 16.8 vs 12.8 overall.
- Opposition: Greece (T20)LOW sample
66 runs off 77 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 85.7 vs 60.6 overall, average 33.0 vs 12.8 overall.
- Venue: Marina Ground, Corfu (T20)LOW sample
66 runs off 77 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 85.7 vs 60.6 overall, average 33.0 vs 12.8 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
68 runs off 140 balls in 15 T20 matches — strike rate 48.6 vs 60.6 overall, average 17.0 vs 12.8 overall.
- Opposition: Italy (T20)LOW sample
44 runs off 93 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 47.3 vs 60.6 overall, average 7.3 vs 12.8 overall.
- Venue: Hazelaarweg, Rotterdam (T20)LOW sample
29 runs off 85 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 34.1 vs 60.6 overall, average 7.3 vs 12.8 overall.
- Venue: Bayer Uerdingen Cricket Ground (T20)LOW sample
39 runs off 77 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 50.6 vs 60.6 overall, average 9.8 vs 12.8 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Italy | T20 | 8 | 44 | 93 | 7.3 | 47.3 | 0.0 | 52.7 | LOW |
| Greece | T20 | 3 | 66 | 77 | 33.0 | 85.7 | 7.8 | 46.8 | LOW |
| Jersey | T20 | 3 | 32 | 58 | 16.0 | 55.2 | 3.4 | 58.6 | LOW |
| Isle of Man | T20 | 1 | 40 | 47 | 40.0 | 85.1 | 6.4 | 40.4 | LOW |
| Netherlands | T20 | 1 | 7 | 31 | 7.0 | 22.6 | 0.0 | 77.4 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Hazelaarweg, Rotterdam | T20 | 5 | 29 | 85 | 7.3 | 34.1 | 0.0 | 65.9 | LOW |
| Roma Cricket Ground | T20 | 4 | 52 | 81 | 17.3 | 64.2 | 4.9 | 55.6 | LOW |
| Bayer Uerdingen Cricket Ground | T20 | 6 | 39 | 77 | 9.8 | 50.6 | 1.3 | 54.5 | LOW |
| Marina Ground, Corfu | T20 | 3 | 66 | 77 | 33.0 | 85.7 | 7.8 | 46.8 | LOW |
| Grainville, St Saviour, Jersey | T20 | 2 | 20 | 33 | 10.0 | 60.6 | 6.1 | 57.6 | LOW |
| Ishoj Cricket Club, Vejledalen | T20 | 3 | 17 | 31 | 8.5 | 54.8 | 3.2 | 58.1 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 28 | 269 | 444 | 12.8 | 60.6 | 4.1 | 56.5 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 17 | 136 | 217 | 19.4 | 62.7 | 4.6 | 59.0 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 17 | 94 | 168 | 8.5 | 56.0 | 3.6 | 58.3 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 7 | 39 | 59 | 13.0 | 66.1 | 3.4 | 42.4 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 24 | 151 | 214 | 16.8 | 70.6 | 6.5 | 56.5 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 15 | 68 | 140 | 17.0 | 48.6 | 1.4 | 57.1 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 17 | 50 | 90 | 6.3 | 55.6 | 2.2 | 55.6 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.