K Waiswa betting stats, splits & projections
Bowler
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 42 | 505 | 479 | 15.8 | 105.4 | 12.9 | 47.2 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 522 | 606 | 41 | 7.0 | 14.8 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where K Waiswa scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Venue: Gahanga International Cricket Stadium. Rwanda (T20)MEDIUM sample
269 runs off 196 balls in 17 T20 matches — strike rate 137.2 vs 105.4 overall, average 19.2 vs 15.8 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
199 runs off 166 balls in 33 T20 matches — strike rate 119.9 vs 105.4 overall, average 15.3 vs 15.8 overall.
- Opposition: Tanzania (T20)LOW sample
165 runs off 111 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 148.6 vs 105.4 overall, average 23.6 vs 15.8 overall.
- Opposition: Rwanda (T20)LOW sample
104 runs off 85 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 122.4 vs 105.4 overall, average 14.9 vs 15.8 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)LOW sample
153 runs off 111 balls in 17 T20 matches — strike rate 137.8 vs 105.4 overall, average 19.1 vs 15.8 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)MEDIUM sample
136 runs off 151 balls in 18 T20 matches — strike rate 90.1 vs 105.4 overall, average 17.0 vs 15.8 overall.
- Opposition: Namibia (T20)LOW sample
42 runs off 64 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 65.6 vs 105.4 overall, average 10.5 vs 15.8 overall.
- Venue: United Cricket Club Ground, Windhoek (T20)LOW sample
41 runs off 60 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 68.3 vs 105.4 overall, average 13.7 vs 15.8 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Tanzania | T20 | 9 | 165 | 111 | 23.6 | 148.6 | 20.7 | 34.2 | LOW |
| Rwanda | T20 | 8 | 104 | 85 | 14.9 | 122.4 | 18.8 | 42.4 | LOW |
| Kenya | T20 | 8 | 81 | 72 | 16.2 | 112.5 | 12.5 | 45.8 | LOW |
| Namibia | T20 | 4 | 42 | 64 | 10.5 | 65.6 | 6.3 | 59.4 | LOW |
Bowling
| Tanzania | T20 | 144 | 197 | 15 | 8.2 | 13.1 | LOW |
| Kenya | T20 | 126 | 122 | 8 | 5.8 | 15.3 | LOW |
| Rwanda | T20 | 84 | 91 | 7 | 6.5 | 13.0 | LOW |
| Namibia | T20 | 48 | 82 | 0 | 10.3 | — | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Gahanga International Cricket Stadium. Rwanda | T20 | 17 | 269 | 196 | 19.2 | 137.2 | 19.9 | 37.8 | MEDIUM |
| United Cricket Club Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 4 | 41 | 60 | 13.7 | 68.3 | 6.7 | 56.7 | LOW |
| Gymkhana Club Ground, Nairobi | T20 | 5 | 60 | 47 | 15.0 | 127.7 | 10.6 | 38.3 | LOW |
| Queens Sports Club, Bulawayo | T20 | 3 | 39 | 45 | 13.0 | 86.7 | 6.7 | 48.9 | LOW |
| Willowmoore Park, Benoni | T20 | 3 | 33 | 40 | 16.5 | 82.5 | 7.5 | 47.5 | LOW |
| Achimota Senior Secondary School B Field, Accra | T20 | 2 | 33 | 31 | 16.5 | 106.5 | 16.1 | 54.8 | LOW |
Bowling
| Gahanga International Cricket Stadium. Rwanda | T20 | 228 | 288 | 22 | 7.6 | 13.1 | MEDIUM |
| Gymkhana Club Ground, Nairobi | T20 | 102 | 78 | 6 | 4.6 | 13.0 | LOW |
| Willowmoore Park, Benoni | T20 | 66 | 69 | 8 | 6.3 | 8.6 | LOW |
| United Cricket Club Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 36 | 70 | 0 | 11.7 | — | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 42 | 505 | 479 | 15.8 | 105.4 | 12.9 | 47.2 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 522 | 606 | 41 | 7.0 | 14.8 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 27 | 216 | 217 | 13.5 | 99.5 | 11.5 | 43.3 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 18 | 136 | 151 | 17.0 | 90.1 | 12.6 | 60.9 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 17 | 153 | 111 | 19.1 | 137.8 | 16.2 | 36.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 294 | 346 | 17 | 7.1 | 20.4 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 150 | 177 | 21 | 7.1 | 8.4 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 78 | 83 | 3 | 6.4 | 27.7 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 32 | 261 | 261 | 18.6 | 100.0 | 10.7 | 44.8 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | T20 | 33 | 199 | 166 | 15.3 | 119.9 | 18.7 | 51.8 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 13 | 45 | 52 | 9.0 | 86.5 | 5.8 | 44.2 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.