£
ExclusiveFreeBets
.com

Karanbir Singh betting stats, splits & projections

All-rounder

Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.

Record by format

Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.

overallT20562537145251.8174.728.842.8HIGH
overallT20415575368.316.0HIGH

Why we like it

Splits where Karanbir Singh scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.

  • Bowling type: SPIN (T20)HIGH sample

    667 runs off 354 balls in 26 T20 matches — strike rate 188.4 vs 174.7 overall, average 60.6 vs 51.8 overall.

  • Phase: middle (T20)HIGH sample

    1264 runs off 608 balls in 30 T20 matches — strike rate 207.9 vs 174.7 overall, average 70.2 vs 51.8 overall.

  • Opposition: Romania (T20)MEDIUM sample

    495 runs off 262 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 188.9 vs 174.7 overall, average 61.9 vs 51.8 overall.

  • Opposition: Hungary (T20)MEDIUM sample

    460 runs off 212 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 217.0 vs 174.7 overall, average 92.0 vs 51.8 overall.

  • Opposition: Germany (T20)MEDIUM sample

    252 runs off 126 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 200.0 vs 174.7 overall, average 84.0 vs 51.8 overall.

  • Opposition: Belgium (T20)MEDIUM sample

    254 runs off 123 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 206.5 vs 174.7 overall, average 50.8 vs 51.8 overall.

Risks

Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.

  • Bowling type: PACE (T20)HIGH sample

    1426 runs off 878 balls in 54 T20 matches — strike rate 162.4 vs 174.7 overall, average 49.2 vs 51.8 overall.

  • Phase: powerplay (T20)HIGH sample

    1177 runs off 800 balls in 56 T20 matches — strike rate 147.1 vs 174.7 overall, average 45.3 vs 51.8 overall.

  • Opposition: Switzerland (T20)MEDIUM sample

    208 runs off 148 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 140.5 vs 174.7 overall, average 69.3 vs 51.8 overall.

  • Opposition: Norway (T20)MEDIUM sample

    191 runs off 145 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 131.7 vs 174.7 overall, average 47.8 vs 51.8 overall.

  • Venue: Simar Cricket Ground, Rome (T20)MEDIUM sample

    223 runs off 152 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 146.7 vs 174.7 overall, average 55.8 vs 51.8 overall.

  • Venue: Scott Page Field, Vinor (T20)MEDIUM sample

    228 runs off 146 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 156.2 vs 174.7 overall, average 114.0 vs 51.8 overall.

Against each opponent

Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.

RomaniaT20949526261.9188.932.141.6MEDIUM
HungaryT20646021292.0217.037.728.8MEDIUM
SwitzerlandT20420814869.3140.521.650.0MEDIUM
NorwayT20519114547.8131.720.748.3MEDIUM
GermanyT20425212684.0200.033.342.1MEDIUM
BelgiumT20525412350.8206.533.340.7MEDIUM
FranceT2031288842.7145.523.947.7LOW
SloveniaT2041167929.0146.825.349.4LOW
Czech RepublicT202925892.0158.624.143.1LOW
CyprusT202765476.0140.720.444.4LOW
PortugalT201513151.0164.522.638.7LOW
GuernseyT201593059.0196.730.040.0LOW

Bowling

RomaniaT2011014688.018.3LOW
HungaryT204273610.412.2LOW
SloveniaT20423745.39.3LOW
SwitzerlandT20384747.411.8LOW
FranceT20365028.325.0LOW

By venue

Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.

Velden Cricket Ground, LatschachT20944025655.0171.927.346.1MEDIUM
Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov CountyT201144323940.3185.432.244.8MEDIUM
GB Oval, SzodligetT207507225101.4225.339.128.9MEDIUM
Simar Cricket Ground, RomeT20422315255.8146.722.440.8MEDIUM
Scott Page Field, VinorT204228146114.0156.225.343.8MEDIUM
Bayer Uerdingen Cricket GroundT20425212684.0200.033.342.1MEDIUM
Botkyrka Cricket Center, StockholmT20714311720.4122.218.853.0LOW
Happy Valley Ground 2T20517610144.0174.326.742.6LOW
Ballpark Ground, GrazT202785039.0156.026.048.0LOW
Happy Valley GroundT202453322.5136.424.251.5LOW

Bowling

Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov CountyT20124170128.214.2LOW
Velden Cricket Ground, LatschachT20627156.914.2LOW
Simar Cricket Ground, RomeT20608848.822.0LOW
GB Oval, SzodligetT20425247.413.0LOW
Botkyrka Cricket Center, StockholmT20374637.515.3LOW

By country

Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.

UnknownT20562537145251.8174.728.842.8HIGH

Bowling

UnknownT20415575368.316.0HIGH

By match phase

Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.

powerplayT2056117780045.3147.126.552.4HIGH
middleT2030126460870.2207.931.431.1HIGH
deathT209964419.2218.234.129.5LOW

Bowling

middleT20216284167.917.8MEDIUM
deathT20163243198.912.8MEDIUM
powerplayT20364818.048.0LOW

Against pace and spin

Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.

PACET2054142687849.2162.427.845.9HIGH
SPINT202666735460.6188.428.536.2HIGH
UNKNOWNT202744422049.3201.833.240.9MEDIUM

How these splits are used

The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.