Khadeeja Fatima betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 5 | 55 | 92 | 18.3 | 59.8 | 2.2 | 52.2 | LOW |
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Argentina | T20 | 5 | 55 | 92 | 18.3 | 59.8 | 2.2 | 52.2 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| St George's College Ground, Buenos Aires | T20 | 5 | 55 | 92 | 18.3 | 59.8 | 2.2 | 52.2 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 5 | 55 | 92 | 18.3 | 59.8 | 2.2 | 52.2 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 3 | 41 | 63 | — | 65.1 | 3.2 | 47.6 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 5 | 45 | 71 | 15.0 | 63.4 | 2.8 | 52.1 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.