Khizer Ahmed betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 39 | 756 | 616 | 22.2 | 122.7 | 16.2 | 43.0 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where Khizer Ahmed scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Sweden (T20)LOW sample
115 runs off 70 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 164.3 vs 122.7 overall, average 23.0 vs 22.2 overall.
- Venue: Bayer Uerdingen Cricket Ground (T20)LOW sample
148 runs off 96 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 154.2 vs 122.7 overall, average 29.6 vs 22.2 overall.
- Venue: Koge Cricket Club (T20)LOW sample
104 runs off 73 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 142.5 vs 122.7 overall, average 104.0 vs 22.2 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample
149 runs off 94 balls in 14 T20 matches — strike rate 158.5 vs 122.7 overall, not yet dismissed vs 22.2 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Opposition: Finland (T20)MEDIUM sample
133 runs off 122 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 109.0 vs 122.7 overall, average 26.6 vs 22.2 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
143 runs off 128 balls in 17 T20 matches — strike rate 111.7 vs 122.7 overall, average 10.2 vs 22.2 overall.
- Venue: Desert Springs Cricket Ground, Almeria (T20)LOW sample
47 runs off 61 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 77.0 vs 122.7 overall, average 15.7 vs 22.2 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)LOW sample
115 runs off 109 balls in 20 T20 matches — strike rate 105.5 vs 122.7 overall, average 12.8 vs 22.2 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Finland | T20 | 6 | 133 | 122 | 26.6 | 109.0 | 13.1 | 43.4 | MEDIUM |
| Sweden | T20 | 5 | 115 | 70 | 23.0 | 164.3 | 22.9 | 30.0 | LOW |
| Portugal | T20 | 5 | 81 | 67 | 16.2 | 120.9 | 16.4 | 52.2 | LOW |
| France | T20 | 3 | 73 | 63 | 36.5 | 115.9 | 14.3 | 49.2 | LOW |
| Denmark | T20 | 2 | 65 | 53 | 65.0 | 122.6 | 15.1 | 41.5 | LOW |
| Guernsey | T20 | 2 | 39 | 42 | 19.5 | 92.9 | 9.5 | 45.2 | LOW |
| Austria | T20 | 5 | 30 | 30 | 6.0 | 100.0 | 13.3 | 53.3 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Santarem Cricket Ground | T20 | 8 | 154 | 130 | 22.0 | 118.5 | 15.4 | 50.8 | MEDIUM |
| Bayer Uerdingen Cricket Ground | T20 | 5 | 148 | 96 | 29.6 | 154.2 | 24.0 | 38.5 | LOW |
| Koge Cricket Club | T20 | 3 | 104 | 73 | 104.0 | 142.5 | 19.2 | 31.5 | LOW |
| Kerava National Cricket Ground | T20 | 3 | 84 | 67 | 42.0 | 125.4 | 16.4 | 40.3 | LOW |
| Desert Springs Cricket Ground, Almeria | T20 | 4 | 47 | 61 | 15.7 | 77.0 | 8.2 | 54.1 | LOW |
| Ishoj Cricket Club, Vejledalen | T20 | 3 | 71 | 58 | 23.7 | 122.4 | 13.8 | 36.2 | LOW |
| Scott Page Field, Vinor | T20 | 4 | 56 | 44 | 14.0 | 127.3 | 15.9 | 38.6 | LOW |
| Botkyrka Cricket Center, Stockholm | T20 | 6 | 34 | 43 | 5.7 | 79.1 | 9.3 | 58.1 | LOW |
| Stubberudmyra Cricket Ground, Oslo | T20 | 2 | 57 | 41 | 28.5 | 139.0 | 19.5 | 34.1 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 39 | 756 | 616 | 22.2 | 122.7 | 16.2 | 43.0 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 39 | 600 | 480 | 30.0 | 125.0 | 17.7 | 45.4 | HIGH |
| middle | T20 | 17 | 143 | 128 | 10.2 | 111.7 | 10.2 | 34.4 | MEDIUM |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 37 | 492 | 413 | 19.7 | 119.1 | 16.0 | 46.7 | HIGH |
| SPIN | T20 | 20 | 115 | 109 | 12.8 | 105.5 | 11.9 | 38.5 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 14 | 149 | 94 | — | 158.5 | 22.3 | 31.9 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.