KJ Ferrary betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 16 | 348 | 308 | 29.0 | 113.0 | 12.7 | 33.1 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 272 | 311 | 18 | 6.9 | 17.3 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where KJ Ferrary scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Malta (T20)MEDIUM sample
235 runs off 193 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 121.8 vs 113.0 overall, average 47.0 vs 29.0 overall.
- Venue: Marsa Sports Club (T20)MEDIUM sample
278 runs off 233 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 119.3 vs 113.0 overall, average 39.7 vs 29.0 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
170 runs off 129 balls in 11 T20 matches — strike rate 131.8 vs 113.0 overall, average 34.0 vs 29.0 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
220 runs off 179 balls in 14 T20 matches — strike rate 122.9 vs 113.0 overall, average 27.5 vs 29.0 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)LOW sample
81 runs off 62 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 130.6 vs 113.0 overall, average 20.3 vs 29.0 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)LOW sample
106 runs off 119 balls in 13 T20 matches — strike rate 89.1 vs 113.0 overall, average 17.7 vs 29.0 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)LOW sample
47 runs off 67 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 70.1 vs 113.0 overall, not yet dismissed vs 29.0 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Malta | T20 | 7 | 235 | 193 | 47.0 | 121.8 | 14.5 | 30.6 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| Malta | T20 | 66 | 95 | 2 | 8.6 | 47.5 | LOW |
| Serbia | T20 | 48 | 41 | 3 | 5.1 | 13.7 | LOW |
| Norway | T20 | 42 | 63 | 3 | 9.0 | 21.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Marsa Sports Club | T20 | 9 | 278 | 233 | 39.7 | 119.3 | 14.2 | 31.3 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| Marsa Sports Club | T20 | 126 | 155 | 5 | 7.4 | 31.0 | LOW |
| Koge Cricket Club | T20 | 60 | 74 | 2 | 7.4 | 37.0 | LOW |
| Bayer Uerdingen Cricket Ground | T20 | 38 | 48 | 5 | 7.6 | 9.6 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 16 | 348 | 308 | 29.0 | 113.0 | 12.7 | 33.1 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 272 | 311 | 18 | 6.9 | 17.3 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 14 | 220 | 179 | 27.5 | 122.9 | 14.5 | 29.1 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 9 | 47 | 67 | — | 70.1 | 6.0 | 47.8 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 5 | 81 | 62 | 20.3 | 130.6 | 14.5 | 29.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 230 | 243 | 13 | 6.3 | 18.7 | MEDIUM |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 11 | 170 | 129 | 34.0 | 131.8 | 16.3 | 30.2 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | T20 | 13 | 106 | 119 | 17.7 | 89.1 | 9.2 | 42.9 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 10 | 72 | 60 | 72.0 | 120.0 | 11.7 | 20.0 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.