KJ Stagno betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 28 | 744 | 434 | 27.6 | 171.4 | 25.3 | 37.1 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where KJ Stagno scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Venue: Europa Sports Complex (T20)MEDIUM sample
447 runs off 238 balls in 13 T20 matches — strike rate 187.8 vs 171.4 overall, average 34.4 vs 27.6 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)MEDIUM sample
273 runs off 128 balls in 15 T20 matches — strike rate 213.3 vs 171.4 overall, average 54.6 vs 27.6 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)MEDIUM sample
278 runs off 168 balls in 18 T20 matches — strike rate 165.5 vs 171.4 overall, average 46.3 vs 27.6 overall.
- Opposition: Luxembourg (T20)LOW sample
169 runs off 94 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 179.8 vs 171.4 overall, average 84.5 vs 27.6 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
256 runs off 182 balls in 22 T20 matches — strike rate 140.7 vs 171.4 overall, average 21.3 vs 27.6 overall.
- Venue: Koge Cricket Club (T20)LOW sample
87 runs off 61 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 142.6 vs 171.4 overall, average 29.0 vs 27.6 overall.
- Venue: Royal Brussels Cricket Club Ground, Waterloo (T20)LOW sample
96 runs off 60 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 160.0 vs 171.4 overall, average 32.0 vs 27.6 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Luxembourg | T20 | 2 | 169 | 94 | 84.5 | 179.8 | 24.5 | 29.8 | LOW |
| Portugal | T20 | 6 | 123 | 70 | 24.6 | 175.7 | 25.7 | 41.4 | LOW |
| Malta | T20 | 4 | 105 | 49 | 26.3 | 214.3 | 32.7 | 26.5 | LOW |
| Serbia | T20 | 4 | 80 | 48 | 20.0 | 166.7 | 29.2 | 47.9 | LOW |
| Norway | T20 | 2 | 86 | 42 | 43.0 | 204.8 | 28.6 | 23.8 | LOW |
| Belgium | T20 | 2 | 55 | 38 | 27.5 | 144.7 | 23.7 | 50.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Europa Sports Complex | T20 | 13 | 447 | 238 | 34.4 | 187.8 | 28.6 | 34.0 | MEDIUM |
| Koge Cricket Club | T20 | 3 | 87 | 61 | 29.0 | 142.6 | 21.3 | 42.6 | LOW |
| Royal Brussels Cricket Club Ground, Waterloo | T20 | 3 | 96 | 60 | 32.0 | 160.0 | 23.3 | 40.0 | LOW |
| Bayer Uerdingen Cricket Ground | T20 | 4 | 85 | 46 | 21.3 | 184.8 | 26.1 | 30.4 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 28 | 744 | 434 | 27.6 | 171.4 | 25.3 | 37.1 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 21 | 376 | 229 | 20.9 | 164.2 | 22.7 | 33.2 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 18 | 278 | 168 | 46.3 | 165.5 | 25.6 | 44.0 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 4 | 90 | 37 | 30.0 | 243.2 | 40.5 | 29.7 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 22 | 256 | 182 | 21.3 | 140.7 | 20.9 | 44.0 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 15 | 273 | 128 | 54.6 | 213.3 | 32.8 | 29.7 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 19 | 215 | 124 | 21.5 | 173.4 | 24.2 | 34.7 | MEDIUM |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.