L Barnett betting stats, splits & projections
All-rounder
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 18 | 832 | 505 | 83.2 | 164.8 | 26.7 | 32.5 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 414 | 268 | 16 | 3.9 | 16.8 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where L Barnett scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Greece (T20)MEDIUM sample
265 runs off 152 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 174.3 vs 164.8 overall, average 132.5 vs 83.2 overall.
- Venue: Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County (T20)MEDIUM sample
430 runs off 227 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 189.4 vs 164.8 overall, average 215.0 vs 83.2 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
465 runs off 279 balls in 17 T20 matches — strike rate 166.7 vs 164.8 overall, average 116.3 vs 83.2 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)MEDIUM sample
230 runs off 128 balls in 13 T20 matches — strike rate 179.7 vs 164.8 overall, average 115.0 vs 83.2 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)MEDIUM sample
460 runs off 298 balls in 18 T20 matches — strike rate 154.4 vs 164.8 overall, average 92.0 vs 83.2 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
323 runs off 183 balls in 11 T20 matches — strike rate 176.5 vs 164.8 overall, average 80.8 vs 83.2 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Venue: Simar Cricket Ground, Rome (T20)LOW sample
97 runs off 65 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 149.2 vs 164.8 overall, average 32.3 vs 83.2 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)LOW sample
137 runs off 98 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 139.8 vs 164.8 overall, average 34.3 vs 83.2 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Greece | T20 | 5 | 265 | 152 | 132.5 | 174.3 | 29.6 | 30.9 | MEDIUM |
| Norway | T20 | 1 | 123 | 63 | — | 195.2 | 31.7 | 19.0 | LOW |
| Malta | T20 | 2 | 84 | 50 | — | 168.0 | 26.0 | 30.0 | LOW |
| Romania | T20 | 2 | 93 | 48 | — | 193.8 | 35.4 | 27.1 | LOW |
| Germany | T20 | 1 | 54 | 47 | 54.0 | 114.9 | 17.0 | 44.7 | LOW |
| Jersey | T20 | 2 | 63 | 45 | 31.5 | 140.0 | 20.0 | 35.6 | LOW |
| Sweden | T20 | 1 | 77 | 44 | 77.0 | 175.0 | 27.3 | 31.8 | LOW |
| Turkey | T20 | 1 | 59 | 33 | 59.0 | 178.8 | 30.3 | 36.4 | LOW |
Bowling
| Greece | T20 | 120 | 65 | 3 | 3.3 | 21.7 | LOW |
| Malta | T20 | 48 | 19 | 1 | 2.4 | 19.0 | LOW |
| Jersey | T20 | 42 | 37 | 2 | 5.3 | 18.5 | LOW |
| Romania | T20 | 42 | 28 | 3 | 4.0 | 9.3 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 8 | 430 | 227 | 215.0 | 189.4 | 33.0 | 28.2 | MEDIUM |
| Marsa Sports Club | T20 | 3 | 194 | 119 | 194.0 | 163.0 | 25.2 | 29.4 | LOW |
| Simar Cricket Ground, Rome | T20 | 3 | 97 | 65 | 32.3 | 149.2 | 20.0 | 33.8 | LOW |
| Roma Cricket Ground | T20 | 2 | 61 | 58 | 30.5 | 105.2 | 15.5 | 46.6 | LOW |
| New Farnley CC, Leeds | T20 | 2 | 50 | 36 | 25.0 | 138.9 | 22.2 | 44.4 | LOW |
Bowling
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 186 | 101 | 10 | 3.3 | 10.1 | MEDIUM |
| Marsa Sports Club | T20 | 72 | 44 | 0 | 3.7 | — | LOW |
| Simar Cricket Ground, Rome | T20 | 72 | 53 | 1 | 4.4 | 53.0 | LOW |
| New Farnley CC, Leeds | T20 | 42 | 34 | 2 | 4.9 | 17.0 | LOW |
| Roma Cricket Ground | T20 | 42 | 36 | 3 | 5.1 | 12.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 18 | 832 | 505 | 83.2 | 164.8 | 26.7 | 32.5 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 414 | 268 | 16 | 3.9 | 16.8 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 18 | 460 | 298 | 92.0 | 154.4 | 25.5 | 37.2 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 11 | 323 | 183 | 80.8 | 176.5 | 27.9 | 26.8 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| powerplay | T20 | 294 | 162 | 12 | 3.3 | 13.5 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 66 | 52 | 1 | 4.7 | 52.0 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 54 | 54 | 3 | 6.0 | 18.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 17 | 465 | 279 | 116.3 | 166.7 | 26.5 | 34.1 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 13 | 230 | 128 | 115.0 | 179.7 | 29.7 | 28.9 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 10 | 137 | 98 | 34.3 | 139.8 | 23.5 | 32.7 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.