L Sanogo betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 12 | 31 | 60 | 3.9 | 51.7 | 6.7 | 68.3 | LOW |
| overall | T20 | 102 | 129 | 6 | 7.6 | 21.5 | LOW |
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
Bowling
| Lesotho | T20 | 48 | 51 | 3 | 6.4 | 17.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
Bowling
| Integrated Polytechnic Regional Centre | T20 | 54 | 70 | 1 | 7.8 | 70.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 12 | 31 | 60 | 3.9 | 51.7 | 6.7 | 68.3 | LOW |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 102 | 129 | 6 | 7.6 | 21.5 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
Bowling
| powerplay | T20 | 54 | 80 | 0 | 8.9 | — | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.