L Steenkamp betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 18 | 453 | 333 | 26.6 | 136.0 | 17.7 | 31.8 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where L Steenkamp scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
286 runs off 201 balls in 18 T20 matches — strike rate 142.3 vs 136.0 overall, average 47.7 vs 26.6 overall.
- Venue: Harare Sports Club (T20)LOW sample
110 runs off 75 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 146.7 vs 136.0 overall, average 22.0 vs 26.6 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Opposition: South Africa (T20)LOW sample
115 runs off 90 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 127.8 vs 136.0 overall, average 57.5 vs 26.6 overall.
- Opposition: Zimbabwe (T20)LOW sample
74 runs off 60 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 123.3 vs 136.0 overall, average 18.5 vs 26.6 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)LOW sample
138 runs off 110 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 125.5 vs 136.0 overall, average 19.7 vs 26.6 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| South Africa | T20 | 3 | 115 | 90 | 57.5 | 127.8 | 15.6 | 34.4 | LOW |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 4 | 74 | 60 | 18.5 | 123.3 | 13.3 | 31.7 | LOW |
| Scotland | T20 | 3 | 78 | 49 | 26.0 | 159.2 | 22.4 | 22.4 | LOW |
| United States of America | T20 | 1 | 58 | 39 | 58.0 | 148.7 | 20.5 | 33.3 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Namibia Cricket Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 8 | 213 | 158 | 30.4 | 134.8 | 17.7 | 32.3 | MEDIUM |
| Harare Sports Club | T20 | 5 | 110 | 75 | 22.0 | 146.7 | 17.3 | 25.3 | LOW |
| MA Chidambaram Stadium, Chepauk, Chennai | T20 | 1 | 58 | 39 | 58.0 | 148.7 | 20.5 | 33.3 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 13 | 343 | 258 | 28.6 | 132.9 | 17.8 | 33.7 | MEDIUM |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 5 | 110 | 75 | 22.0 | 146.7 | 17.3 | 25.3 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 17 | 288 | 211 | 32.0 | 136.5 | 19.9 | 36.0 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 9 | 138 | 110 | 19.7 | 125.5 | 11.8 | 25.5 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 18 | 286 | 201 | 47.7 | 142.3 | 20.9 | 34.3 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 13 | 121 | 92 | 20.2 | 131.5 | 14.1 | 28.3 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 10 | 46 | 40 | 9.2 | 115.0 | 10.0 | 27.5 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.