LA Dunbar betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 33 | 872 | 735 | 33.5 | 118.6 | 16.1 | 43.5 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 7.0 | — | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where LA Dunbar scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)HIGH sample
422 runs off 321 balls in 27 T20 matches — strike rate 131.5 vs 118.6 overall, average 28.1 vs 33.5 overall.
- Opposition: Bulgaria (T20)MEDIUM sample
451 runs off 281 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 160.5 vs 118.6 overall, average 64.4 vs 33.5 overall.
- Venue: National Sports Academy, Sofia (T20)MEDIUM sample
343 runs off 180 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 190.6 vs 118.6 overall, average 68.6 vs 33.5 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)MEDIUM sample
231 runs off 186 balls in 20 T20 matches — strike rate 124.2 vs 118.6 overall, average 57.8 vs 33.5 overall.
- Venue: Lisicji Jarak Cricket Ground (T20)LOW sample
130 runs off 90 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 144.4 vs 118.6 overall, average 65.0 vs 33.5 overall.
- Venue: Koge Cricket Club (T20)LOW sample
86 runs off 63 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 136.5 vs 118.6 overall, average 43.0 vs 33.5 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: middle (T20)HIGH sample
494 runs off 466 balls in 29 T20 matches — strike rate 106.0 vs 118.6 overall, average 30.9 vs 33.5 overall.
- Opposition: Gibraltar (T20)MEDIUM sample
100 runs off 135 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 74.1 vs 118.6 overall, average 20.0 vs 33.5 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
219 runs off 228 balls in 22 T20 matches — strike rate 96.1 vs 118.6 overall, average 31.3 vs 33.5 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)MEDIUM sample
146 runs off 163 balls in 16 T20 matches — strike rate 89.6 vs 118.6 overall, average 36.5 vs 33.5 overall.
- Venue: Europa Sports Complex (T20)LOW sample
64 runs off 103 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 62.1 vs 118.6 overall, average 16.0 vs 33.5 overall.
- Venue: Happy Valley Ground 2 (T20)LOW sample
64 runs off 69 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 92.8 vs 118.6 overall, average 21.3 vs 33.5 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Bulgaria | T20 | 9 | 451 | 281 | 64.4 | 160.5 | 24.6 | 37.7 | MEDIUM |
| Gibraltar | T20 | 5 | 100 | 135 | 20.0 | 74.1 | 6.7 | 52.6 | MEDIUM |
| Croatia | T20 | 3 | 41 | 56 | 20.5 | 73.2 | 8.9 | 57.1 | LOW |
| Cyprus | T20 | 3 | 35 | 46 | 11.7 | 76.1 | 6.5 | 45.7 | LOW |
| Slovenia | T20 | 1 | 72 | 37 | 72.0 | 194.6 | 29.7 | 16.2 | LOW |
| Luxembourg | T20 | 2 | 43 | 33 | 43.0 | 130.3 | 18.2 | 33.3 | LOW |
| Belgium | T20 | 2 | 21 | 32 | 21.0 | 65.6 | 3.1 | 46.9 | LOW |
| Estonia | T20 | 1 | 50 | 30 | — | 166.7 | 26.7 | 23.3 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| National Sports Academy, Sofia | T20 | 7 | 343 | 180 | 68.6 | 190.6 | 30.6 | 32.2 | MEDIUM |
| Europa Sports Complex | T20 | 4 | 64 | 103 | 16.0 | 62.1 | 5.8 | 60.2 | LOW |
| Lisicji Jarak Cricket Ground | T20 | 3 | 130 | 90 | 65.0 | 144.4 | 20.0 | 32.2 | LOW |
| Happy Valley Ground 2 | T20 | 3 | 64 | 69 | 21.3 | 92.8 | 11.6 | 49.3 | LOW |
| Koge Cricket Club | T20 | 3 | 86 | 63 | 43.0 | 136.5 | 17.5 | 27.0 | LOW |
| Bayer Uerdingen Cricket Ground | T20 | 4 | 48 | 58 | 12.0 | 82.8 | 10.3 | 55.2 | LOW |
| Tikkurila Cricket Ground | T20 | 3 | 27 | 45 | 9.0 | 60.0 | 6.7 | 71.1 | LOW |
| Happy Valley Ground | T20 | 1 | 31 | 35 | 31.0 | 88.6 | 8.6 | 40.0 | LOW |
| Scott Page Field, Vinor | T20 | 2 | 43 | 33 | 43.0 | 130.3 | 18.2 | 33.3 | LOW |
| Kerava National Cricket Ground | T20 | 2 | 17 | 30 | 17.0 | 56.7 | 3.3 | 60.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 33 | 872 | 735 | 33.5 | 118.6 | 16.1 | 43.5 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 29 | 494 | 466 | 30.9 | 106.0 | 13.1 | 44.0 | HIGH |
| powerplay | T20 | 16 | 146 | 163 | 36.5 | 89.6 | 12.9 | 55.8 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 11 | 232 | 106 | 38.7 | 218.9 | 34.0 | 22.6 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 27 | 422 | 321 | 28.1 | 131.5 | 18.7 | 40.8 | HIGH |
| SPIN | T20 | 22 | 219 | 228 | 31.3 | 96.1 | 11.0 | 48.2 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 20 | 231 | 186 | 57.8 | 124.2 | 17.7 | 42.5 | MEDIUM |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.