Likitha Yadav betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 7 | 80 | 162 | 13.3 | 49.4 | 3.7 | 66.7 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 134 | 110 | 9 | 4.9 | 12.2 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where Likitha Yadav scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Croatia (T20)LOW sample
61 runs off 95 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 64.2 vs 49.4 overall, average 61.0 vs 13.3 overall.
- Venue: Marsa Sports Club (T20)LOW sample
69 runs off 119 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 58.0 vs 49.4 overall, average 34.5 vs 13.3 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
No split is materially below their own format baseline.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Croatia | T20 | 2 | 61 | 95 | 61.0 | 64.2 | 5.3 | 57.9 | LOW |
| Cyprus | T20 | 4 | 11 | 43 | 2.8 | 25.6 | 0.0 | 76.7 | LOW |
Bowling
| Cyprus | T20 | 80 | 60 | 7 | 4.5 | 8.6 | LOW |
| Croatia | T20 | 42 | 41 | 1 | 5.9 | 41.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Marsa Sports Club | T20 | 3 | 69 | 119 | 34.5 | 58.0 | 5.0 | 63.0 | LOW |
| Happy Valley Ground | T20 | 4 | 11 | 43 | 2.8 | 25.6 | 0.0 | 76.7 | LOW |
Bowling
| Happy Valley Ground | T20 | 80 | 60 | 7 | 4.5 | 8.6 | LOW |
| Marsa Sports Club | T20 | 54 | 50 | 2 | 5.6 | 25.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 7 | 80 | 162 | 13.3 | 49.4 | 3.7 | 66.7 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 134 | 110 | 9 | 4.9 | 12.2 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 4 | 37 | 82 | 12.3 | 45.1 | 2.4 | 67.1 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 6 | 38 | 69 | 12.7 | 55.1 | 5.8 | 68.1 | LOW |
Bowling
| powerplay | T20 | 102 | 79 | 6 | 4.6 | 13.2 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 6 | 72 | 141 | 18.0 | 51.1 | 4.3 | 66.7 | MEDIUM |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.