LJ Leokaoke betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 8 | 196 | 167 | 32.7 | 117.4 | 19.2 | 50.9 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 108 | 133 | 3 | 7.4 | 44.3 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where LJ Leokaoke scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Venue: Malkerns Country Club oval (T20)MEDIUM sample
186 runs off 137 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 135.8 vs 117.4 overall, average 62.0 vs 32.7 overall.
- Opposition: Eswatini (T20)LOW sample
102 runs off 65 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 156.9 vs 117.4 overall, average 102.0 vs 32.7 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample
90 runs off 61 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 147.5 vs 117.4 overall, not yet dismissed vs 32.7 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)LOW sample
104 runs off 68 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 152.9 vs 117.4 overall, average 26.0 vs 32.7 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)LOW sample
77 runs off 84 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 91.7 vs 117.4 overall, average 25.7 vs 32.7 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)LOW sample
42 runs off 69 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 60.9 vs 117.4 overall, average 21.0 vs 32.7 overall.
Current projections
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Mozambique | T20 | 3 | 84 | 72 | 42.0 | 116.7 | 19.4 | 52.8 | LOW |
| Eswatini | T20 | 2 | 102 | 65 | 102.0 | 156.9 | 27.7 | 38.5 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Malkerns Country Club oval | T20 | 5 | 186 | 137 | 62.0 | 135.8 | 23.4 | 46.0 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| Malkerns Country Club oval | T20 | 54 | 78 | 2 | 8.7 | 39.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 8 | 196 | 167 | 32.7 | 117.4 | 19.2 | 50.9 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 108 | 133 | 3 | 7.4 | 44.3 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 7 | 42 | 69 | 21.0 | 60.9 | 8.7 | 68.1 | LOW |
| middle | T20 | 6 | 104 | 68 | 26.0 | 152.9 | 26.5 | 41.2 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 2 | 50 | 30 | — | 166.7 | 26.7 | 33.3 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 90 | 96 | 3 | 6.4 | 32.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 8 | 77 | 84 | 25.7 | 91.7 | 13.1 | 53.6 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 3 | 90 | 61 | — | 147.5 | 27.9 | 47.5 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.