LL Dimba betting stats, splits & projections
Bowler
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 24 | 361 | 428 | 18.1 | 84.3 | 10.7 | 52.3 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 431 | 355 | 20 | 4.9 | 17.8 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where LL Dimba scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Lesotho (T20)LOW sample
116 runs off 76 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 152.6 vs 84.3 overall, average 116.0 vs 18.1 overall.
- Venue: Botswana Cricket Association Oval 2, Gaborone (T20)LOW sample
100 runs off 81 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 123.5 vs 84.3 overall, average 100.0 vs 18.1 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample
81 runs off 83 balls in 11 T20 matches — strike rate 97.6 vs 84.3 overall, average 27.0 vs 18.1 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Venue: Gahanga B Ground, Rwanda (T20)MEDIUM sample
138 runs off 191 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 72.3 vs 84.3 overall, average 17.3 vs 18.1 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
124 runs off 171 balls in 15 T20 matches — strike rate 72.5 vs 84.3 overall, average 15.5 vs 18.1 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)MEDIUM sample
100 runs off 131 balls in 15 T20 matches — strike rate 76.3 vs 84.3 overall, average 16.7 vs 18.1 overall.
- Opposition: Rwanda (T20)LOW sample
51 runs off 83 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 61.4 vs 84.3 overall, average 12.8 vs 18.1 overall.
- Opposition: Cameroon (T20)LOW sample
52 runs off 69 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 75.4 vs 84.3 overall, average 26.0 vs 18.1 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Rwanda | T20 | 5 | 51 | 83 | 12.8 | 61.4 | 4.8 | 55.4 | LOW |
| Brazil | T20 | 3 | 68 | 77 | 22.7 | 88.3 | 10.4 | 44.2 | LOW |
| Lesotho | T20 | 2 | 116 | 76 | 116.0 | 152.6 | 22.4 | 26.3 | LOW |
| Cameroon | T20 | 3 | 52 | 69 | 26.0 | 75.4 | 11.6 | 60.9 | LOW |
| Uganda | T20 | 2 | 31 | 42 | 31.0 | 73.8 | 11.9 | 66.7 | LOW |
| Botswana | T20 | 2 | 14 | 36 | 7.0 | 38.9 | 0.0 | 66.7 | LOW |
Bowling
| Rwanda | T20 | 101 | 84 | 2 | 5.0 | 42.0 | LOW |
| Cameroon | T20 | 84 | 50 | 6 | 3.6 | 8.3 | LOW |
| Brazil | T20 | 60 | 46 | 4 | 4.6 | 11.5 | LOW |
| Nigeria | T20 | 48 | 45 | 3 | 5.6 | 15.0 | LOW |
| Uganda | T20 | 48 | 43 | 2 | 5.4 | 21.5 | LOW |
| Sierra Leone | T20 | 42 | 48 | 1 | 6.9 | 48.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Gahanga B Ground, Rwanda | T20 | 10 | 138 | 191 | 17.3 | 72.3 | 8.9 | 57.1 | MEDIUM |
| Gahanga International Cricket Stadium. Rwanda | T20 | 7 | 69 | 89 | 11.5 | 77.5 | 12.4 | 59.6 | LOW |
| Botswana Cricket Association Oval 2, Gaborone | T20 | 2 | 100 | 81 | 100.0 | 123.5 | 14.8 | 30.9 | LOW |
| Botswana Cricket Association Oval 1, Gaborone | T20 | 5 | 54 | 67 | 10.8 | 80.6 | 9.0 | 55.2 | LOW |
Bowling
| Gahanga B Ground, Rwanda | T20 | 215 | 183 | 9 | 5.1 | 20.3 | MEDIUM |
| Gahanga International Cricket Stadium. Rwanda | T20 | 150 | 121 | 8 | 4.8 | 15.1 | MEDIUM |
| Botswana Cricket Association Oval 1, Gaborone | T20 | 42 | 39 | 3 | 5.6 | 13.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 24 | 361 | 428 | 18.1 | 84.3 | 10.7 | 52.3 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 431 | 355 | 20 | 4.9 | 17.8 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 18 | 197 | 240 | 19.7 | 82.1 | 9.6 | 51.2 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 15 | 100 | 131 | 16.7 | 76.3 | 11.5 | 64.1 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 7 | 64 | 57 | 16.0 | 112.3 | 14.0 | 29.8 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 306 | 243 | 13 | 4.8 | 18.7 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 102 | 84 | 7 | 4.9 | 12.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 18 | 156 | 174 | 17.3 | 89.7 | 12.6 | 52.3 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 15 | 124 | 171 | 15.5 | 72.5 | 8.2 | 54.4 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 11 | 81 | 83 | 27.0 | 97.6 | 12.0 | 48.2 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.