Luka Woods betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 11 | 341 | 242 | 31.0 | 140.9 | 21.9 | 44.2 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 221 | 280 | 9 | 7.6 | 31.1 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where Luka Woods scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)MEDIUM sample
218 runs off 168 balls in 11 T20 matches — strike rate 129.8 vs 140.9 overall, average 54.5 vs 31.0 overall.
- Opposition: Luxembourg (T20)LOW sample
140 runs off 76 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 184.2 vs 140.9 overall, average 70.0 vs 31.0 overall.
- Venue: Scott Page Field, Vinor (T20)LOW sample
140 runs off 76 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 184.2 vs 140.9 overall, average 70.0 vs 31.0 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample
118 runs off 71 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 166.2 vs 140.9 overall, average 118.0 vs 31.0 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)LOW sample
123 runs off 74 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 166.2 vs 140.9 overall, average 17.6 vs 31.0 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
No split is materially below their own format baseline.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Luxembourg | T20 | 2 | 140 | 76 | 70.0 | 184.2 | 30.3 | 35.5 | LOW |
| Gibraltar | T20 | 3 | 87 | 61 | 29.0 | 142.6 | 23.0 | 45.9 | LOW |
Bowling
| Gibraltar | T20 | 53 | 63 | 3 | 7.1 | 21.0 | LOW |
| Luxembourg | T20 | 36 | 65 | 2 | 10.8 | 32.5 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Scott Page Field, Vinor | T20 | 2 | 140 | 76 | 70.0 | 184.2 | 30.3 | 35.5 | LOW |
| Koge Cricket Club | T20 | 3 | 93 | 63 | 31.0 | 147.6 | 25.4 | 46.0 | LOW |
| Europa Sports Complex | T20 | 2 | 48 | 41 | 24.0 | 117.1 | 14.6 | 46.3 | LOW |
| Bayer Uerdingen Cricket Ground | T20 | 3 | 34 | 37 | 11.3 | 91.9 | 10.8 | 51.4 | LOW |
Bowling
| Bayer Uerdingen Cricket Ground | T20 | 72 | 63 | 3 | 5.3 | 21.0 | LOW |
| Koge Cricket Club | T20 | 66 | 79 | 4 | 7.2 | 19.8 | LOW |
| Scott Page Field, Vinor | T20 | 36 | 65 | 2 | 10.8 | 32.5 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 11 | 341 | 242 | 31.0 | 140.9 | 21.9 | 44.2 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 221 | 280 | 9 | 7.6 | 31.1 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 11 | 218 | 168 | 54.5 | 129.8 | 20.8 | 48.8 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 7 | 123 | 74 | 17.6 | 166.2 | 24.3 | 33.8 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 191 | 245 | 9 | 7.7 | 27.2 | MEDIUM |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 8 | 160 | 115 | 32.0 | 139.1 | 22.6 | 44.3 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 7 | 118 | 71 | 118.0 | 166.2 | 26.8 | 40.8 | LOW |
| SPIN | T20 | 7 | 63 | 56 | 12.6 | 112.5 | 14.3 | 48.2 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.