M Gogev betting stats, splits & projections
Bowler
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 27 | 634 | 435 | 24.4 | 145.7 | 21.4 | 43.9 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 431 | 673 | 13 | 9.4 | 51.8 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where M Gogev scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
365 runs off 235 balls in 16 T20 matches — strike rate 155.3 vs 145.7 overall, average 28.1 vs 24.4 overall.
- Opposition: Gibraltar (T20)LOW sample
175 runs off 80 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 218.8 vs 145.7 overall, average 43.8 vs 24.4 overall.
- Venue: Vassil Levski National Sports Academy, Sofia (T20)LOW sample
244 runs off 110 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 221.8 vs 145.7 overall, average 61.0 vs 24.4 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample
131 runs off 67 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 195.5 vs 145.7 overall, average 43.7 vs 24.4 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Venue: Happy Valley Ground 2 (T20)MEDIUM sample
172 runs off 137 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 125.5 vs 145.7 overall, average 28.7 vs 24.4 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
164 runs off 125 balls in 16 T20 matches — strike rate 131.2 vs 145.7 overall, average 20.5 vs 24.4 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)MEDIUM sample
252 runs off 193 balls in 22 T20 matches — strike rate 130.6 vs 145.7 overall, average 22.9 vs 24.4 overall.
- Opposition: Cyprus (T20)LOW sample
87 runs off 85 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 102.4 vs 145.7 overall, average 21.8 vs 24.4 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Cyprus | T20 | 4 | 87 | 85 | 21.8 | 102.4 | 12.9 | 47.1 | LOW |
| Gibraltar | T20 | 4 | 175 | 80 | 43.8 | 218.8 | 37.5 | 38.8 | LOW |
| Serbia | T20 | 2 | 85 | 52 | 42.5 | 163.5 | 23.1 | 40.4 | LOW |
| Romania | T20 | 6 | 36 | 46 | 6.0 | 78.3 | 10.9 | 65.2 | LOW |
| Turkey | T20 | 2 | 86 | 41 | 86.0 | 209.8 | 31.7 | 19.5 | LOW |
| Malta | T20 | 1 | 55 | 31 | 55.0 | 177.4 | 22.6 | 32.3 | LOW |
Bowling
| Romania | T20 | 102 | 151 | 3 | 8.9 | 50.3 | LOW |
| Gibraltar | T20 | 78 | 136 | 4 | 10.5 | 34.0 | LOW |
| Finland | T20 | 48 | 85 | 3 | 10.6 | 28.3 | LOW |
| Turkey | T20 | 45 | 85 | 0 | 11.3 | — | LOW |
| Cyprus | T20 | 38 | 50 | 1 | 7.9 | 50.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Happy Valley Ground 2 | T20 | 6 | 172 | 137 | 28.7 | 125.5 | 16.8 | 44.5 | MEDIUM |
| Vassil Levski National Sports Academy, Sofia | T20 | 5 | 244 | 110 | 61.0 | 221.8 | 37.3 | 31.8 | LOW |
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 7 | 53 | 57 | 7.6 | 93.0 | 12.3 | 59.6 | LOW |
| Guernsey Rovers Athletic Club Ground, Port Soif | T20 | 3 | 35 | 39 | 11.7 | 89.7 | 10.3 | 51.3 | LOW |
| Tikkurila Cricket Ground | T20 | 4 | 48 | 38 | 12.0 | 126.3 | 18.4 | 52.6 | LOW |
| King George V Sports Ground, Castel | T20 | 1 | 55 | 31 | 55.0 | 177.4 | 22.6 | 32.3 | LOW |
Bowling
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 120 | 177 | 3 | 8.9 | 59.0 | LOW |
| Vassil Levski National Sports Academy, Sofia | T20 | 105 | 195 | 4 | 11.1 | 48.8 | LOW |
| Tikkurila Cricket Ground | T20 | 72 | 124 | 3 | 10.3 | 41.3 | LOW |
| Happy Valley Ground 2 | T20 | 50 | 63 | 2 | 7.6 | 31.5 | LOW |
| Guernsey Rovers Athletic Club Ground, Port Soif | T20 | 42 | 68 | 1 | 9.7 | 68.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 27 | 634 | 435 | 24.4 | 145.7 | 21.4 | 43.9 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 431 | 673 | 13 | 9.4 | 51.8 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 16 | 365 | 235 | 28.1 | 155.3 | 21.3 | 37.9 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 22 | 252 | 193 | 22.9 | 130.6 | 20.7 | 51.3 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 150 | 212 | 1 | 8.5 | 212.0 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 144 | 230 | 3 | 9.6 | 76.7 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 137 | 231 | 9 | 10.1 | 25.7 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 25 | 339 | 243 | 22.6 | 139.5 | 21.4 | 48.1 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 16 | 164 | 125 | 20.5 | 131.2 | 17.6 | 40.8 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 9 | 131 | 67 | 43.7 | 195.5 | 28.4 | 34.3 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.