M Heingo betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 1 | 0 | 2 | — | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | LOW |
| overall | T20 | 229 | 351 | 12 | 9.2 | 29.3 | MEDIUM |
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
Bowling
| Scotland | T20 | 60 | 104 | 4 | 10.4 | 26.0 | LOW |
| South Africa | T20 | 60 | 95 | 3 | 9.5 | 31.7 | LOW |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 36 | 43 | 1 | 7.2 | 43.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
Bowling
| Namibia Cricket Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 205 | 299 | 12 | 8.8 | 24.9 | MEDIUM |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 229 | 351 | 12 | 9.2 | 29.3 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 114 | 173 | 5 | 9.1 | 34.6 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 60 | 93 | 1 | 9.3 | 93.0 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 55 | 85 | 6 | 9.3 | 14.2 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.