M Hill betting stats, splits & projections
All-rounder
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 78 | 1809 | 1817 | 28.3 | 99.6 | 12.8 | 48.7 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 690 | 584 | 38 | 5.1 | 15.4 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where M Hill scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)HIGH sample
443 runs off 347 balls in 29 T20 matches — strike rate 127.7 vs 99.6 overall, average 55.4 vs 28.3 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)HIGH sample
874 runs off 788 balls in 43 T20 matches — strike rate 110.9 vs 99.6 overall, average 39.7 vs 28.3 overall.
- Opposition: Bhutan (T20)MEDIUM sample
235 runs off 214 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 109.8 vs 99.6 overall, average 39.2 vs 28.3 overall.
- Opposition: Japan (T20)MEDIUM sample
221 runs off 202 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 109.4 vs 99.6 overall, average 36.8 vs 28.3 overall.
- Opposition: China (T20)MEDIUM sample
188 runs off 168 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 111.9 vs 99.6 overall, average 37.6 vs 28.3 overall.
- Opposition: Tanzania (T20)MEDIUM sample
174 runs off 152 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 114.5 vs 99.6 overall, average 58.0 vs 28.3 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)HIGH sample
712 runs off 784 balls in 71 T20 matches — strike rate 90.8 vs 99.6 overall, average 23.7 vs 28.3 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)HIGH sample
774 runs off 914 balls in 76 T20 matches — strike rate 84.7 vs 99.6 overall, average 22.8 vs 28.3 overall.
- Opposition: Uganda (T20)MEDIUM sample
98 runs off 140 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 70.0 vs 99.6 overall, average 32.7 vs 28.3 overall.
- Opposition: Nepal (T20)MEDIUM sample
121 runs off 120 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 100.8 vs 99.6 overall, average 15.1 vs 28.3 overall.
- Venue: Entebbe Cricket Oval (T20)MEDIUM sample
92 runs off 128 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 71.9 vs 99.6 overall, average 23.0 vs 28.3 overall.
- Opposition: Namibia (T20)LOW sample
84 runs off 113 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 74.3 vs 99.6 overall, average 16.8 vs 28.3 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| United Arab Emirates | T20 | 9 | 218 | 224 | 27.3 | 97.3 | 11.2 | 47.3 | MEDIUM |
| Bhutan | T20 | 6 | 235 | 214 | 39.2 | 109.8 | 15.0 | 44.4 | MEDIUM |
| Japan | T20 | 7 | 221 | 202 | 36.8 | 109.4 | 14.9 | 46.0 | MEDIUM |
| China | T20 | 5 | 188 | 168 | 37.6 | 111.9 | 16.7 | 49.4 | MEDIUM |
| Tanzania | T20 | 5 | 174 | 152 | 58.0 | 114.5 | 15.8 | 40.8 | MEDIUM |
| Uganda | T20 | 5 | 98 | 140 | 32.7 | 70.0 | 4.3 | 51.4 | MEDIUM |
| Nepal | T20 | 8 | 121 | 120 | 15.1 | 100.8 | 15.0 | 51.7 | MEDIUM |
| Namibia | T20 | 6 | 84 | 113 | 16.8 | 74.3 | 10.6 | 62.8 | LOW |
| Thailand | T20 | 5 | 73 | 100 | 18.3 | 73.0 | 8.0 | 59.0 | LOW |
| Malaysia | T20 | 6 | 83 | 92 | 20.8 | 90.2 | 12.0 | 54.3 | LOW |
| Maldives | T20 | 1 | 100 | 63 | — | 158.7 | 20.6 | 19.0 | LOW |
| South Korea | T20 | 1 | 60 | 52 | — | 115.4 | 7.7 | 38.5 | LOW |
| Netherlands | T20 | 4 | 30 | 42 | 7.5 | 71.4 | 9.5 | 57.1 | LOW |
| Qatar | T20 | 1 | 41 | 39 | — | 105.1 | 10.3 | 38.5 | LOW |
| Myanmar | T20 | 1 | 33 | 36 | — | 91.7 | 13.9 | 61.1 | LOW |
| Kuwait | T20 | 4 | 27 | 34 | 6.8 | 79.4 | 11.8 | 58.8 | LOW |
Bowling
| Japan | T20 | 132 | 84 | 6 | 3.8 | 14.0 | LOW |
| Nepal | T20 | 111 | 85 | 4 | 4.6 | 21.3 | LOW |
| United Arab Emirates | T20 | 108 | 116 | 7 | 6.4 | 16.6 | LOW |
| China | T20 | 48 | 24 | 2 | 3.0 | 12.0 | LOW |
| Netherlands | T20 | 47 | 68 | 2 | 8.7 | 34.0 | LOW |
| Bhutan | T20 | 42 | 29 | 3 | 4.1 | 9.7 | LOW |
| Kuwait | T20 | 42 | 26 | 2 | 3.7 | 13.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Bayuemas Oval, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 10 | 192 | 159 | 24.0 | 120.8 | 16.4 | 42.1 | MEDIUM |
| Gelephu International Cricket Ground | T20 | 5 | 151 | 145 | 30.2 | 104.1 | 15.2 | 51.0 | MEDIUM |
| Namibia Cricket Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 4 | 146 | 142 | 73.0 | 102.8 | 11.3 | 41.5 | MEDIUM |
| Yeonhui Cricket Ground, Incheon | T20 | 3 | 133 | 139 | 66.5 | 95.7 | 10.8 | 48.2 | MEDIUM |
| Mission Road Ground, Mong Kok, Hong Kong | T20 | 7 | 143 | 129 | 20.4 | 110.9 | 17.1 | 53.5 | MEDIUM |
| Entebbe Cricket Oval | T20 | 5 | 92 | 128 | 23.0 | 71.9 | 5.5 | 52.3 | MEDIUM |
| Terdthai Cricket Ground, Bangkok | T20 | 3 | 75 | 106 | 37.5 | 70.8 | 5.7 | 52.8 | LOW |
| Kaizuka Cricket Ground | T20 | 4 | 133 | 102 | 44.3 | 130.4 | 18.6 | 40.2 | LOW |
| Kolej Tuanku Jaafar Cricket Oval, Mantin | T20 | 3 | 91 | 99 | 45.5 | 91.9 | 11.1 | 48.5 | LOW |
| UKM-YSD Cricket Oval, Bangi | T20 | 4 | 94 | 98 | 31.3 | 95.9 | 11.2 | 48.0 | LOW |
| Malek Cricket Ground, Ajman | T20 | 4 | 78 | 94 | 26.0 | 83.0 | 10.6 | 47.9 | LOW |
| United Cricket Club Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 4 | 102 | 88 | 25.5 | 115.9 | 14.8 | 50.0 | LOW |
| Hong Kong Cricket Club | T20 | 4 | 111 | 84 | 37.0 | 132.1 | 20.2 | 39.3 | LOW |
| High Performance Oval, Windhoek | T20 | 3 | 53 | 74 | 26.5 | 71.6 | 9.5 | 60.8 | LOW |
| YSD-UKM Cricket Oval, Bangi | T20 | 2 | 72 | 68 | 36.0 | 105.9 | 16.2 | 48.5 | LOW |
| Kinrara Academy Oval, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 3 | 76 | 57 | 38.0 | 133.3 | 24.6 | 45.6 | LOW |
| Sportpark Maarschalkerweerd, Utrecht | T20 | 4 | 30 | 42 | 7.5 | 71.4 | 9.5 | 57.1 | LOW |
| Selangor Turf Club, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 2 | 26 | 41 | 13.0 | 63.4 | 4.9 | 61.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| Bayuemas Oval, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 117 | 73 | 5 | 3.7 | 14.6 | LOW |
| Kaizuka Cricket Ground | T20 | 102 | 73 | 5 | 4.3 | 14.6 | LOW |
| UKM-YSD Cricket Oval, Bangi | T20 | 66 | 56 | 2 | 5.1 | 28.0 | LOW |
| Hong Kong Cricket Club | T20 | 64 | 30 | 7 | 2.8 | 4.3 | LOW |
| Kinrara Academy Oval, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 54 | 52 | 2 | 5.8 | 26.0 | LOW |
| Malek Cricket Ground, Ajman | T20 | 54 | 52 | 6 | 5.8 | 8.7 | LOW |
| Entebbe Cricket Oval | T20 | 48 | 53 | 4 | 6.6 | 13.3 | LOW |
| United Cricket Club Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 48 | 69 | 2 | 8.6 | 34.5 | LOW |
| Sportpark Maarschalkerweerd, Utrecht | T20 | 47 | 68 | 2 | 8.7 | 34.0 | LOW |
| Selangor Turf Club, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 42 | 27 | 2 | 3.9 | 13.5 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 78 | 1809 | 1817 | 28.3 | 99.6 | 12.8 | 48.7 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 690 | 584 | 38 | 5.1 | 15.4 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 76 | 774 | 914 | 22.8 | 84.7 | 12.0 | 58.6 | HIGH |
| middle | T20 | 43 | 874 | 788 | 39.7 | 110.9 | 12.6 | 39.1 | HIGH |
| death | T20 | 12 | 161 | 115 | 20.1 | 140.0 | 20.9 | 34.8 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 414 | 375 | 13 | 5.4 | 28.8 | HIGH |
| death | T20 | 153 | 113 | 18 | 4.4 | 6.3 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 123 | 96 | 7 | 4.7 | 13.7 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 71 | 712 | 784 | 23.7 | 90.8 | 13.0 | 55.1 | HIGH |
| SPIN | T20 | 56 | 654 | 686 | 25.2 | 95.3 | 10.3 | 46.6 | HIGH |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 29 | 443 | 347 | 55.4 | 127.7 | 17.3 | 38.0 | HIGH |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.