£
ExclusiveFreeBets
.com

M Kasselman betting stats, splits & projections

Batter

Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.

Record by format

Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.

overallT202449040425.8121.315.643.8HIGH
overallT20611011.0—LOW

Why we like it

Splits where M Kasselman scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.

  • Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample

    322 runs off 232 balls in 20 T20 matches — strike rate 138.8 vs 121.3 overall, average 32.2 vs 25.8 overall.

  • Phase: powerplay (T20)MEDIUM sample

    289 runs off 212 balls in 18 T20 matches — strike rate 136.3 vs 121.3 overall, average 36.1 vs 25.8 overall.

  • Opposition: Ivory Coast (T20)LOW sample

    121 runs off 62 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 195.2 vs 121.3 overall, average 121.0 vs 25.8 overall.

  • Venue: Botswana Cricket Association Oval 1, Gaborone (T20)LOW sample

    187 runs off 116 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 161.2 vs 121.3 overall, average 62.3 vs 25.8 overall.

Risks

Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.

  • Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample

    178 runs off 172 balls in 13 T20 matches — strike rate 103.5 vs 121.3 overall, average 17.8 vs 25.8 overall.

  • Opposition: Uganda (T20)LOW sample

    50 runs off 66 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 75.8 vs 121.3 overall, average 12.5 vs 25.8 overall.

  • Venue: Takashinga Sports Club, Highfield, Harare (T20)LOW sample

    63 runs off 87 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 72.4 vs 121.3 overall, average 15.8 vs 25.8 overall.

  • Bowling type: SPIN (T20)LOW sample

    61 runs off 84 balls in 12 T20 matches — strike rate 72.6 vs 121.3 overall, average 8.7 vs 25.8 overall.

Against each opponent

Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.

RwandaT204927423.0124.321.650.0LOW
UgandaT204506612.575.89.159.1LOW
Ivory CoastT20212162121.0195.224.219.4LOW
NigeriaT205665516.5120.012.741.8LOW
Sierra LeoneT202744974.0151.024.542.9LOW
ZimbabweT201263526.074.35.757.1LOW

By venue

Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.

Botswana Cricket Association Oval 1, GaboroneT20418711662.3161.221.632.8LOW
Gahanga International Cricket Stadium. RwandaT20812510317.9121.416.545.6LOW
Takashinga Sports Club, Highfield, HarareT204638715.872.44.648.3LOW
Harare Sports ClubT201263526.074.35.757.1LOW

By country

Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.

UnknownT202346436925.8125.716.542.5HIGH
ZimbabweT201263526.074.35.757.1LOW

By match phase

Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.

powerplayT201828921236.1136.320.845.3MEDIUM
middleT201317817217.8103.59.943.0MEDIUM

Against pace and spin

Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.

PACET202032223232.2138.819.840.1MEDIUM
UNKNOWNT20141078853.5121.613.644.3LOW
SPINT201261848.772.66.053.6LOW

How these splits are used

The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.