M Levitt betting stats, splits & projections
All-rounder
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 29 | 957 | 671 | 34.2 | 142.6 | 20.1 | 41.3 | HIGH |
| overall | ODI | 13 | 336 | 405 | 25.8 | 83.0 | 13.1 | 65.4 | HIGH |
| overall | ODI | 252 | 188 | 2 | 4.5 | 94.0 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 96 | 139 | 5 | 8.7 | 27.8 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where M Levitt scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Nepal (T20)MEDIUM sample
231 runs off 145 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 159.3 vs 142.6 overall, average 38.5 vs 34.2 overall.
- Venue: Titwood, Glasgow (T20)MEDIUM sample
244 runs off 159 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 153.5 vs 142.6 overall, average 61.0 vs 34.2 overall.
- Venue: Tribhuvan University International Cricket Ground, Kirtipur (T20)MEDIUM sample
247 runs off 131 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 188.5 vs 142.6 overall, average 61.8 vs 34.2 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (ODI)MEDIUM sample
145 runs off 147 balls in 8 ODI matches — strike rate 98.6 vs 83.0 overall, average 36.3 vs 25.8 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
329 runs off 200 balls in 15 T20 matches — strike rate 164.5 vs 142.6 overall, average 27.4 vs 34.2 overall.
- Opposition: Namibia (T20)LOW sample
163 runs off 77 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 211.7 vs 142.6 overall, average 81.5 vs 34.2 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)HIGH sample
581 runs off 445 balls in 29 T20 matches — strike rate 130.6 vs 142.6 overall, average 41.5 vs 34.2 overall.
- Opposition: Namibia (ODI)LOW sample
57 runs off 85 balls in 2 ODI matches — strike rate 67.1 vs 83.0 overall, average 28.5 vs 25.8 overall.
- Opposition: Canada (T20)LOW sample
75 runs off 67 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 111.9 vs 142.6 overall, average 75.0 vs 34.2 overall.
- Venue: Sportpark Westvliet, The Hague (T20)LOW sample
110 runs off 102 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 107.8 vs 142.6 overall, average 22.0 vs 34.2 overall.
- Venue: VRA Ground, Amstelveen (ODI)LOW sample
69 runs off 99 balls in 2 ODI matches — strike rate 69.7 vs 83.0 overall, average 34.5 vs 25.8 overall.
- Venue: Sportpark Westvliet, Voorburg (T20)LOW sample
82 runs off 69 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 118.8 vs 142.6 overall, average 20.5 vs 34.2 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Nepal | T20 | 6 | 231 | 145 | 38.5 | 159.3 | 23.4 | 39.3 | MEDIUM |
| Scotland | T20 | 5 | 192 | 139 | 38.4 | 138.1 | 16.5 | 36.7 | MEDIUM |
| United Arab Emirates | ODI | 3 | 92 | 106 | 30.7 | 86.8 | 12.3 | 59.4 | LOW |
| Namibia | ODI | 2 | 57 | 85 | 28.5 | 67.1 | 11.8 | 71.8 | LOW |
| Namibia | T20 | 2 | 163 | 77 | 81.5 | 211.7 | 32.5 | 27.3 | LOW |
| Canada | T20 | 2 | 75 | 67 | 75.0 | 111.9 | 13.4 | 44.8 | LOW |
| Scotland | ODI | 2 | 60 | 65 | 30.0 | 92.3 | 13.8 | 60.0 | LOW |
| Ireland | T20 | 2 | 58 | 58 | 29.0 | 100.0 | 12.1 | 53.4 | LOW |
| Canada | ODI | 2 | 45 | 56 | 22.5 | 80.4 | 14.3 | 66.1 | LOW |
| United States of America | ODI | 2 | 43 | 56 | 21.5 | 76.8 | 10.7 | 67.9 | LOW |
| United States of America | T20 | 3 | 79 | 51 | 26.3 | 154.9 | 23.5 | 41.2 | LOW |
| Nepal | ODI | 2 | 39 | 37 | 19.5 | 105.4 | 18.9 | 73.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| Scotland | ODI | 72 | 67 | 0 | 5.6 | — | LOW |
| Canada | ODI | 60 | 33 | 1 | 3.3 | 33.0 | LOW |
| United Arab Emirates | ODI | 60 | 41 | 1 | 4.1 | 41.0 | LOW |
| Nepal | ODI | 36 | 31 | 0 | 5.2 | — | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Titwood, Glasgow | T20 | 4 | 244 | 159 | 61.0 | 153.5 | 18.9 | 35.2 | MEDIUM |
| Tribhuvan University International Cricket Ground, Kirtipur | T20 | 4 | 247 | 131 | 61.8 | 188.5 | 30.5 | 32.8 | MEDIUM |
| Tribhuvan University International Cricket Ground, Kirtipur | ODI | 4 | 96 | 122 | 24.0 | 78.7 | 13.9 | 72.1 | MEDIUM |
| Sportpark Westvliet, The Hague | T20 | 5 | 110 | 102 | 22.0 | 107.8 | 13.7 | 50.0 | LOW |
| Sportpark Maarschalkerweerd, Utrecht | T20 | 3 | 143 | 101 | 71.5 | 141.6 | 19.8 | 39.6 | LOW |
| VRA Ground, Amstelveen | ODI | 2 | 69 | 99 | 34.5 | 69.7 | 9.1 | 64.6 | LOW |
| Sportpark Westvliet, Voorburg | T20 | 4 | 82 | 69 | 20.5 | 118.8 | 15.9 | 42.0 | LOW |
| Sportpark Westvliet, The Hague | ODI | 2 | 55 | 68 | 27.5 | 80.9 | 13.2 | 66.2 | LOW |
| Sportpark Maarschalkerweerd, Utrecht | ODI | 2 | 71 | 62 | 35.5 | 114.5 | 17.7 | 51.6 | LOW |
| Hazelaarweg, Rotterdam | ODI | 2 | 33 | 44 | 16.5 | 75.0 | 11.4 | 68.2 | LOW |
Bowling
| VRA Ground, Amstelveen | ODI | 96 | 70 | 1 | 4.4 | 70.0 | LOW |
| Sportpark Westvliet, The Hague | ODI | 78 | 44 | 1 | 3.4 | 44.0 | LOW |
| Tribhuvan University International Cricket Ground, Kirtipur | T20 | 48 | 83 | 2 | 10.4 | 41.5 | LOW |
| Sportpark Maarschalkerweerd, Utrecht | ODI | 36 | 38 | 0 | 6.3 | — | LOW |
| Tribhuvan University International Cricket Ground, Kirtipur | ODI | 36 | 31 | 0 | 5.2 | — | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 29 | 957 | 671 | 34.2 | 142.6 | 20.1 | 41.3 | HIGH |
| Unknown | ODI | 13 | 336 | 405 | 25.8 | 83.0 | 13.1 | 65.4 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | ODI | 252 | 188 | 2 | 4.5 | 94.0 | MEDIUM |
| Unknown | T20 | 96 | 139 | 5 | 8.7 | 27.8 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 29 | 581 | 445 | 41.5 | 130.6 | 19.1 | 46.5 | HIGH |
| powerplay | ODI | 12 | 230 | 274 | 32.9 | 83.9 | 13.1 | 66.1 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 15 | 329 | 200 | 27.4 | 164.5 | 21.0 | 30.0 | MEDIUM |
| middle | ODI | 5 | 94 | 121 | 18.8 | 77.7 | 12.4 | 64.5 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| middle | ODI | 234 | 163 | 2 | 4.2 | 81.5 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 51 | 72 | 2 | 8.5 | 36.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 29 | 528 | 381 | 40.6 | 138.6 | 20.2 | 42.5 | HIGH |
| SPIN | T20 | 23 | 367 | 247 | 28.2 | 148.6 | 19.8 | 38.5 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | ODI | 13 | 168 | 224 | 21.0 | 75.0 | 11.6 | 67.0 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | ODI | 8 | 145 | 147 | 36.3 | 98.6 | 15.6 | 62.6 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 5 | 62 | 43 | 31.0 | 144.2 | 20.9 | 46.5 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | ODI | 3 | 23 | 34 | 23.0 | 67.6 | 11.8 | 67.6 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.