M McColl betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 36 | 401 | 371 | 15.4 | 108.1 | 12.1 | 34.8 | HIGH |
| overall | ODI | 11 | 209 | 251 | 19.0 | 83.3 | 8.8 | 51.4 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 67 | 60 | 3 | 5.4 | 20.0 | LOW |
| overall | ODI | 30 | 31 | 0 | 6.2 | — | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where M McColl scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Ireland (T20)LOW sample
102 runs off 86 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 118.6 vs 108.1 overall, average 51.0 vs 15.4 overall.
- Opposition: Thailand (ODI)LOW sample
57 runs off 60 balls in 1 ODI match — strike rate 95.0 vs 83.3 overall, average 57.0 vs 19.0 overall.
- Venue: Lahore City Cricket Association Ground (ODI)LOW sample
109 runs off 109 balls in 3 ODI matches — strike rate 100.0 vs 83.3 overall, average 36.3 vs 19.0 overall.
- Venue: Terdthai Cricket Ground, Bangkok (T20)LOW sample
99 runs off 76 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 130.3 vs 108.1 overall, average 24.8 vs 15.4 overall.
- Venue: Tribhuvan University International Cricket Ground, Kirtipur (T20)LOW sample
84 runs off 62 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 135.5 vs 108.1 overall, average 16.8 vs 15.4 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)LOW sample
129 runs off 107 balls in 25 T20 matches — strike rate 120.6 vs 108.1 overall, average 16.1 vs 15.4 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Opposition: Netherlands (T20)LOW sample
95 runs off 98 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 96.9 vs 108.1 overall, average 15.8 vs 15.4 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)LOW sample
63 runs off 69 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 91.3 vs 108.1 overall, average 12.6 vs 15.4 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Netherlands | T20 | 7 | 95 | 98 | 15.8 | 96.9 | 9.2 | 40.8 | LOW |
| Ireland | T20 | 5 | 102 | 86 | 51.0 | 118.6 | 12.8 | 26.7 | LOW |
| Thailand | ODI | 1 | 57 | 60 | 57.0 | 95.0 | 11.7 | 50.0 | LOW |
| Papua New Guinea | ODI | 2 | 38 | 53 | 19.0 | 71.7 | 5.7 | 56.6 | LOW |
| United States of America | ODI | 1 | 38 | 47 | 38.0 | 80.9 | 8.5 | 55.3 | LOW |
| West Indies | ODI | 1 | 45 | 44 | 45.0 | 102.3 | 11.4 | 38.6 | LOW |
| Bangladesh | T20 | 2 | 27 | 33 | 13.5 | 81.8 | 6.1 | 36.4 | LOW |
| Papua New Guinea | T20 | 3 | 29 | 31 | 14.5 | 93.5 | 9.7 | 41.9 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Lahore City Cricket Association Ground | ODI | 3 | 109 | 109 | 36.3 | 100.0 | 11.9 | 44.0 | LOW |
| Terdthai Cricket Ground, Bangkok | T20 | 5 | 99 | 76 | 24.8 | 130.3 | 19.7 | 35.5 | LOW |
| Tribhuvan University International Cricket Ground, Kirtipur | T20 | 6 | 84 | 62 | 16.8 | 135.5 | 21.0 | 30.6 | LOW |
| Zayed Cricket Stadium, Abu Dhabi | T20 | 2 | 56 | 56 | 28.0 | 100.0 | 10.7 | 39.3 | LOW |
| ICC Academy, Dubai | ODI | 1 | 38 | 47 | 38.0 | 80.9 | 8.5 | 55.3 | LOW |
| Desert Springs Cricket Ground, Almeria | T20 | 3 | 39 | 36 | 19.5 | 108.3 | 5.6 | 19.4 | LOW |
| Sportpark Maarschalkerweerd, Utrecht | ODI | 1 | 24 | 33 | 24.0 | 72.7 | 6.1 | 54.5 | LOW |
| Sportpark Maarschalkerweerd, Utrecht | T20 | 3 | 23 | 33 | 7.7 | 69.7 | 0.0 | 42.4 | LOW |
| VRA Ground, Amstelveen | T20 | 2 | 28 | 31 | 14.0 | 90.3 | 9.7 | 51.6 | LOW |
| Gaddafi Stadium, Lahore | ODI | 2 | 20 | 30 | 10.0 | 66.7 | 6.7 | 56.7 | LOW |
Bowling
| Desert Springs Cricket Ground, Almeria | T20 | 53 | 36 | 3 | 4.1 | 12.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 35 | 391 | 360 | 15.0 | 108.6 | 12.5 | 35.3 | HIGH |
| Unknown | ODI | 11 | 209 | 251 | 19.0 | 83.3 | 8.8 | 51.4 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 67 | 60 | 3 | 5.4 | 20.0 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | ODI | 11 | 195 | 239 | 21.7 | 81.6 | 8.4 | 51.5 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 24 | 230 | 210 | 20.9 | 109.5 | 11.4 | 32.4 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 17 | 108 | 92 | 10.8 | 117.4 | 14.1 | 29.3 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 8 | 63 | 69 | 12.6 | 91.3 | 11.6 | 49.3 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 30 | 253 | 245 | 16.9 | 103.3 | 9.4 | 31.8 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | ODI | 11 | 162 | 201 | 18.0 | 80.6 | 8.0 | 51.2 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | T20 | 25 | 129 | 107 | 16.1 | 120.6 | 17.8 | 40.2 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.