M Vivekanandan betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 12 | 75 | 159 | 6.3 | 47.2 | 5.0 | 75.5 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 210 | 358 | 9 | 10.2 | 39.8 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where M Vivekanandan scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Japan (T20)LOW sample
49 runs off 85 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 57.6 vs 47.2 overall, average 8.2 vs 6.3 overall.
- Venue: Sano International Cricket Ground (T20)LOW sample
49 runs off 85 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 57.6 vs 47.2 overall, average 8.2 vs 6.3 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)LOW sample
35 runs off 93 balls in 11 T20 matches — strike rate 37.6 vs 47.2 overall, average 5.8 vs 6.3 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Japan | T20 | 6 | 49 | 85 | 8.2 | 57.6 | 8.2 | 72.9 | LOW |
Bowling
| Japan | T20 | 144 | 250 | 5 | 10.4 | 50.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Sano International Cricket Ground | T20 | 6 | 49 | 85 | 8.2 | 57.6 | 8.2 | 72.9 | LOW |
| Bayuemas Oval, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 3 | 16 | 45 | 5.3 | 35.6 | 2.2 | 80.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| Sano International Cricket Ground | T20 | 144 | 250 | 5 | 10.4 | 50.0 | LOW |
| Bayuemas Oval, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 42 | 87 | 2 | 12.4 | 43.5 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Japan | T20 | 6 | 49 | 85 | 8.2 | 57.6 | 8.2 | 72.9 | LOW |
| Unknown | T20 | 6 | 26 | 74 | 4.3 | 35.1 | 1.4 | 78.4 | LOW |
Bowling
| Japan | T20 | 144 | 250 | 5 | 10.4 | 50.0 | LOW |
| Unknown | T20 | 66 | 108 | 4 | 9.8 | 27.0 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 11 | 35 | 93 | 5.8 | 37.6 | 4.3 | 79.6 | LOW |
| middle | T20 | 6 | 27 | 51 | 5.4 | 52.9 | 5.9 | 74.5 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 102 | 164 | 3 | 9.6 | 54.7 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 54 | 106 | 4 | 11.8 | 26.5 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 54 | 88 | 2 | 9.8 | 44.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 10 | 34 | 81 | 4.3 | 42.0 | 4.9 | 79.0 | LOW |
| PACE | T20 | 6 | 33 | 63 | 33.0 | 52.4 | 4.8 | 71.4 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.