Manpreet Singh betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 45 | 1015 | 718 | 27.4 | 141.4 | 15.2 | 29.4 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 247 | 325 | 7 | 7.9 | 46.4 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where Manpreet Singh scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Phase: middle (T20)HIGH sample
662 runs off 490 balls in 33 T20 matches — strike rate 135.1 vs 141.4 overall, average 38.9 vs 27.4 overall.
- Venue: Singapore National Cricket Ground (T20)MEDIUM sample
368 runs off 232 balls in 14 T20 matches — strike rate 158.6 vs 141.4 overall, average 33.5 vs 27.4 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
313 runs off 204 balls in 27 T20 matches — strike rate 153.4 vs 141.4 overall, average 24.1 vs 27.4 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)MEDIUM sample
225 runs off 120 balls in 16 T20 matches — strike rate 187.5 vs 141.4 overall, average 20.5 vs 27.4 overall.
- Opposition: Qatar (T20)LOW sample
127 runs off 76 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 167.1 vs 141.4 overall, average 42.3 vs 27.4 overall.
- Venue: UKM-YSD Cricket Oval, Bangi (T20)LOW sample
163 runs off 102 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 159.8 vs 141.4 overall, average 27.2 vs 27.4 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Opposition: Bahrain (T20)LOW sample
89 runs off 73 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 121.9 vs 141.4 overall, average 17.8 vs 27.4 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)LOW sample
128 runs off 108 balls in 19 T20 matches — strike rate 118.5 vs 141.4 overall, average 14.2 vs 27.4 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Malaysia | T20 | 10 | 165 | 117 | 20.6 | 141.0 | 13.7 | 28.2 | LOW |
| Hong Kong | T20 | 5 | 111 | 80 | 22.2 | 138.8 | 15.0 | 26.3 | LOW |
| Thailand | T20 | 4 | 115 | 79 | 38.3 | 145.6 | 16.5 | 27.8 | LOW |
| Qatar | T20 | 3 | 127 | 76 | 42.3 | 167.1 | 21.1 | 28.9 | LOW |
| Bahrain | T20 | 5 | 89 | 73 | 17.8 | 121.9 | 11.0 | 28.8 | LOW |
| Indonesia | T20 | 1 | 112 | 44 | — | 254.5 | 40.9 | 13.6 | LOW |
| Maldives | T20 | 1 | 51 | 42 | 51.0 | 121.4 | 11.9 | 38.1 | LOW |
| Jersey | T20 | 1 | 47 | 37 | 47.0 | 127.0 | 8.1 | 27.0 | LOW |
| Saudi Arabia | T20 | 2 | 40 | 34 | 20.0 | 117.6 | 11.8 | 29.4 | LOW |
| Samoa | T20 | 2 | 37 | 30 | 18.5 | 123.3 | 13.3 | 36.7 | LOW |
Bowling
| Bahrain | T20 | 84 | 91 | 2 | 6.5 | 45.5 | LOW |
| Malaysia | T20 | 48 | 109 | 0 | 13.6 | — | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Singapore National Cricket Ground | T20 | 14 | 368 | 232 | 33.5 | 158.6 | 20.7 | 27.2 | MEDIUM |
| Bayuemas Oval, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 7 | 210 | 150 | 30.0 | 140.0 | 13.3 | 28.7 | MEDIUM |
| UKM-YSD Cricket Oval, Bangi | T20 | 6 | 163 | 102 | 27.2 | 159.8 | 20.6 | 30.4 | LOW |
| Tribhuvan University International Cricket Ground, Kirtipur | T20 | 3 | 55 | 47 | 18.3 | 117.0 | 10.6 | 34.0 | LOW |
| Bulawayo Athletic Club | T20 | 3 | 49 | 46 | 16.3 | 106.5 | 6.5 | 37.0 | LOW |
| Indian Association Ground, Singapore | T20 | 3 | 51 | 43 | 25.5 | 118.6 | 9.3 | 34.9 | LOW |
| YSD-UKM Cricket Oval, Bangi | T20 | 3 | 61 | 43 | 20.3 | 141.9 | 14.0 | 27.9 | LOW |
Bowling
| Singapore National Cricket Ground | T20 | 163 | 177 | 7 | 6.5 | 25.3 | MEDIUM |
| UKM-YSD Cricket Oval, Bangi | T20 | 78 | 137 | 0 | 10.5 | — | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 45 | 1015 | 718 | 27.4 | 141.4 | 15.2 | 29.4 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 247 | 325 | 7 | 7.9 | 46.4 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 33 | 662 | 490 | 38.9 | 135.1 | 13.7 | 27.3 | HIGH |
| death | T20 | 16 | 225 | 120 | 20.5 | 187.5 | 21.7 | 24.2 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 19 | 128 | 108 | 14.2 | 118.5 | 14.8 | 44.4 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 186 | 233 | 4 | 7.5 | 58.3 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 42 | 58 | 2 | 8.3 | 29.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 37 | 566 | 414 | 31.4 | 136.7 | 14.7 | 28.5 | HIGH |
| PACE | T20 | 27 | 313 | 204 | 24.1 | 153.4 | 15.7 | 29.4 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 18 | 136 | 100 | 22.7 | 136.0 | 16.0 | 33.0 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.