MBA Lamplough betting stats, splits & projections
All-rounder
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 61 | 614 | 644 | 12.8 | 95.3 | 9.5 | 40.8 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 559 | 590 | 28 | 6.3 | 21.1 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where MBA Lamplough scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
202 runs off 187 balls in 36 T20 matches — strike rate 108.0 vs 95.3 overall, average 15.5 vs 12.8 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)MEDIUM sample
210 runs off 185 balls in 29 T20 matches — strike rate 113.5 vs 95.3 overall, average 10.5 vs 12.8 overall.
- Opposition: Otago (T20)LOW sample
70 runs off 63 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 111.1 vs 95.3 overall, average 14.0 vs 12.8 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Opposition: Wellington (T20)LOW sample
84 runs off 106 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 79.2 vs 95.3 overall, average 16.8 vs 12.8 overall.
- Venue: Basin Reserve, Wellington (T20)LOW sample
71 runs off 82 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 86.6 vs 95.3 overall, average 23.7 vs 12.8 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Wellington | T20 | 6 | 84 | 106 | 16.8 | 79.2 | 6.6 | 44.3 | LOW |
| Otago | T20 | 6 | 70 | 63 | 14.0 | 111.1 | 14.3 | 33.3 | LOW |
| United Arab Emirates | T20 | 7 | 50 | 55 | 12.5 | 90.9 | 7.3 | 41.8 | LOW |
| Canterbury | T20 | 6 | 71 | 54 | 11.8 | 131.5 | 16.7 | 37.0 | LOW |
| Nepal | T20 | 3 | 46 | 53 | 23.0 | 86.8 | 7.5 | 45.3 | LOW |
| Thailand | T20 | 3 | 43 | 52 | 14.3 | 82.7 | 9.6 | 44.2 | LOW |
| Namibia | T20 | 2 | 37 | 46 | 18.5 | 80.4 | 8.7 | 43.5 | LOW |
| Auckland | T20 | 6 | 47 | 42 | 7.8 | 111.9 | 9.5 | 38.1 | LOW |
| Central Districts | T20 | 3 | 40 | 37 | 13.3 | 108.1 | 8.1 | 32.4 | LOW |
Bowling
| United Arab Emirates | T20 | 78 | 82 | 1 | 6.3 | 82.0 | LOW |
| Tanzania | T20 | 60 | 82 | 2 | 8.2 | 41.0 | LOW |
| Namibia | T20 | 48 | 40 | 2 | 5.0 | 20.0 | LOW |
| Uganda | T20 | 48 | 32 | 3 | 4.0 | 10.7 | LOW |
| Central Districts | T20 | 41 | 58 | 3 | 8.5 | 19.3 | LOW |
| Auckland | T20 | 40 | 37 | 2 | 5.6 | 18.5 | LOW |
| Wellington | T20 | 40 | 60 | 3 | 9.0 | 20.0 | LOW |
| Canterbury | T20 | 36 | 37 | 1 | 6.2 | 37.0 | LOW |
| Thailand | T20 | 36 | 22 | 5 | 3.7 | 4.4 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Basin Reserve, Wellington | T20 | 4 | 71 | 82 | 23.7 | 86.6 | 7.3 | 41.5 | LOW |
| Bay Oval, Mount Maunganui | T20 | 6 | 67 | 70 | 11.2 | 95.7 | 11.4 | 41.4 | LOW |
| Bayuemas Oval, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 5 | 37 | 59 | 9.3 | 62.7 | 6.8 | 62.7 | LOW |
| Seddon Park, Hamilton | T20 | 8 | 64 | 55 | 9.1 | 116.4 | 12.7 | 36.4 | LOW |
| Hagley Oval, Christchurch | T20 | 4 | 37 | 36 | 9.3 | 102.8 | 11.1 | 41.7 | LOW |
| High Performance Oval, Windhoek | T20 | 3 | 40 | 36 | 40.0 | 111.1 | 13.9 | 38.9 | LOW |
| Dubai International Cricket Stadium | T20 | 3 | 38 | 34 | 12.7 | 111.8 | 20.6 | 50.0 | LOW |
| Fitzherbert Park, Palmerston North | T20 | 1 | 38 | 32 | 38.0 | 118.8 | 9.4 | 28.1 | LOW |
| Namibia Cricket Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 3 | 36 | 32 | 18.0 | 112.5 | 15.6 | 25.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| Namibia Cricket Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 84 | 105 | 4 | 7.5 | 26.3 | LOW |
| High Performance Oval, Windhoek | T20 | 72 | 49 | 3 | 4.1 | 16.3 | LOW |
| Dubai International Cricket Stadium | T20 | 66 | 72 | 6 | 6.5 | 12.0 | LOW |
| Malek Cricket Ground, Ajman | T20 | 66 | 65 | 1 | 5.9 | 65.0 | LOW |
| Bayuemas Oval, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 48 | 49 | 2 | 6.1 | 24.5 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 61 | 614 | 644 | 12.8 | 95.3 | 9.5 | 40.8 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 559 | 590 | 28 | 6.3 | 21.1 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 45 | 392 | 428 | 15.7 | 91.6 | 8.9 | 42.8 | HIGH |
| death | T20 | 29 | 210 | 185 | 10.5 | 113.5 | 11.9 | 31.4 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 10 | 12 | 31 | 4.0 | 38.7 | 3.2 | 71.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 300 | 300 | 9 | 6.0 | 33.3 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 164 | 162 | 18 | 5.9 | 9.0 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 95 | 128 | 1 | 8.1 | 128.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 53 | 370 | 416 | 10.9 | 88.9 | 8.4 | 42.1 | HIGH |
| PACE | T20 | 36 | 202 | 187 | 15.5 | 108.0 | 12.3 | 40.6 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 13 | 42 | 41 | 42.0 | 102.4 | 7.3 | 29.3 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.