Meghna Rajan betting stats, splits & projections
Bowler
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 12 | 448 | 430 | 64.0 | 104.2 | 7.2 | 34.7 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 321 | 165 | 20 | 3.1 | 8.3 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where Meghna Rajan scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Belgium (T20)LOW sample
122 runs off 103 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 118.4 vs 104.2 overall, not yet dismissed vs 64.0 overall.
- Opposition: Estonia (T20)LOW sample
76 runs off 62 balls in 1 T20 match — strike rate 122.6 vs 104.2 overall, average 76.0 vs 64.0 overall.
- Venue: Pierre Werner Cricket Ground (T20)LOW sample
140 runs off 116 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 120.7 vs 104.2 overall, average 140.0 vs 64.0 overall.
- Venue: Stars Arena Hofstade, Zemst (T20)LOW sample
122 runs off 103 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 118.4 vs 104.2 overall, not yet dismissed vs 64.0 overall.
- Venue: Kerava National Cricket Ground (T20)LOW sample
76 runs off 62 balls in 1 T20 match — strike rate 122.6 vs 104.2 overall, average 76.0 vs 64.0 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)LOW sample
110 runs off 89 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 123.6 vs 104.2 overall, average 22.0 vs 64.0 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Opposition: Germany (T20)MEDIUM sample
110 runs off 149 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 73.8 vs 104.2 overall, average 22.0 vs 64.0 overall.
- Venue: SSC Karlsruhe (T20)MEDIUM sample
110 runs off 149 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 73.8 vs 104.2 overall, average 22.0 vs 64.0 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)LOW sample
54 runs off 69 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 78.3 vs 104.2 overall, average 18.0 vs 64.0 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)LOW sample
58 runs off 77 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 75.3 vs 104.2 overall, average 58.0 vs 64.0 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Germany | T20 | 5 | 110 | 149 | 22.0 | 73.8 | 3.4 | 43.6 | MEDIUM |
| Belgium | T20 | 3 | 122 | 103 | — | 118.4 | 10.7 | 31.1 | LOW |
| Estonia | T20 | 1 | 76 | 62 | 76.0 | 122.6 | 14.5 | 40.3 | LOW |
| Austria | T20 | 1 | 63 | 61 | 63.0 | 103.3 | 1.6 | 31.1 | LOW |
| Luxembourg | T20 | 2 | 77 | 55 | — | 140.0 | 9.1 | 14.5 | LOW |
Bowling
| Germany | T20 | 114 | 77 | 5 | 4.1 | 15.4 | LOW |
| Belgium | T20 | 88 | 29 | 6 | 2.0 | 4.8 | LOW |
| Finland | T20 | 48 | 24 | 2 | 3.0 | 12.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| SSC Karlsruhe | T20 | 5 | 110 | 149 | 22.0 | 73.8 | 3.4 | 43.6 | MEDIUM |
| Pierre Werner Cricket Ground | T20 | 3 | 140 | 116 | 140.0 | 120.7 | 5.2 | 23.3 | LOW |
| Stars Arena Hofstade, Zemst | T20 | 3 | 122 | 103 | — | 118.4 | 10.7 | 31.1 | LOW |
| Kerava National Cricket Ground | T20 | 1 | 76 | 62 | 76.0 | 122.6 | 14.5 | 40.3 | LOW |
Bowling
| SSC Karlsruhe | T20 | 114 | 77 | 5 | 4.1 | 15.4 | LOW |
| Stars Arena Hofstade, Zemst | T20 | 88 | 29 | 6 | 2.0 | 4.8 | LOW |
| Kerava National Cricket Ground | T20 | 65 | 33 | 5 | 3.0 | 6.6 | LOW |
| Pierre Werner Cricket Ground | T20 | 54 | 26 | 4 | 2.9 | 6.5 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 12 | 448 | 430 | 64.0 | 104.2 | 7.2 | 34.7 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 321 | 165 | 20 | 3.1 | 8.3 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 11 | 280 | 264 | 280.0 | 106.1 | 7.2 | 31.1 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 8 | 110 | 89 | 22.0 | 123.6 | 7.9 | 24.7 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 9 | 58 | 77 | 58.0 | 75.3 | 6.5 | 58.4 | LOW |
Bowling
| powerplay | T20 | 144 | 68 | 6 | 2.8 | 11.3 | LOW |
| middle | T20 | 107 | 58 | 11 | 3.3 | 5.3 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 70 | 39 | 3 | 3.3 | 13.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 11 | 283 | 253 | 70.8 | 111.9 | 8.3 | 31.2 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 10 | 111 | 108 | — | 102.8 | 6.5 | 36.1 | LOW |
| SPIN | T20 | 6 | 54 | 69 | 18.0 | 78.3 | 4.3 | 44.9 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.