Mirab Razwan betting stats, splits & projections
Bowler
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 18 | 62 | 128 | 4.8 | 48.4 | 2.3 | 65.6 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 485 | 485 | 28 | 6.0 | 17.3 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where Mirab Razwan scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Phase: death (T20)LOW sample
48 runs off 75 balls in 15 T20 matches — strike rate 64.0 vs 48.4 overall, average 4.8 vs 4.8 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
No split is materially below their own format baseline.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Finland | T20 | 1 | 7 | 34 | — | 20.6 | 0.0 | 82.4 | LOW |
Bowling
| Denmark | T20 | 72 | 70 | 1 | 5.8 | 70.0 | LOW |
| Luxembourg | T20 | 72 | 61 | 5 | 5.1 | 12.2 | LOW |
| Portugal | T20 | 60 | 59 | 2 | 5.9 | 29.5 | LOW |
| Czech Republic | T20 | 42 | 41 | 1 | 5.9 | 41.0 | LOW |
| Austria | T20 | 36 | 37 | 1 | 6.2 | 37.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Ishoj Cricket Club, Vejledalen | T20 | 2 | 7 | 37 | 7.0 | 18.9 | 0.0 | 83.8 | LOW |
| Ekeberg Cricket Ground 1, Oslo | T20 | 3 | 22 | 31 | 7.3 | 71.0 | 6.5 | 64.5 | LOW |
Bowling
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 120 | 125 | 7 | 6.3 | 17.9 | LOW |
| Banks Field, Vinor | T20 | 90 | 86 | 4 | 5.7 | 21.5 | LOW |
| Ekeberg Cricket Ground 1, Oslo | T20 | 72 | 74 | 3 | 6.2 | 24.7 | LOW |
| Santarem Cricket Ground | T20 | 60 | 59 | 2 | 5.9 | 29.5 | LOW |
| Albertslund Cricket Club | T20 | 48 | 55 | 2 | 6.9 | 27.5 | LOW |
| Ishoj Cricket Club, Vejledalen | T20 | 41 | 39 | 7 | 5.7 | 5.6 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 18 | 62 | 128 | 4.8 | 48.4 | 2.3 | 65.6 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 485 | 485 | 28 | 6.0 | 17.3 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| death | T20 | 15 | 48 | 75 | 4.8 | 64.0 | 4.0 | 57.3 | LOW |
| middle | T20 | 6 | 13 | 45 | 6.5 | 28.9 | 0.0 | 75.6 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 377 | 383 | 20 | 6.1 | 19.1 | HIGH |
| death | T20 | 72 | 79 | 7 | 6.6 | 11.3 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 36 | 23 | 1 | 3.8 | 23.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 11 | 19 | 57 | 2.7 | 33.3 | 0.0 | 71.9 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 11 | 38 | 55 | 7.6 | 69.1 | 5.5 | 58.2 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.