MO Kitunda betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 37 | 477 | 489 | 14.0 | 97.5 | 11.2 | 48.9 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where MO Kitunda scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Uganda (T20)MEDIUM sample
206 runs off 176 balls in 11 T20 matches — strike rate 117.0 vs 97.5 overall, average 20.6 vs 14.0 overall.
- Venue: Gahanga International Cricket Stadium. Rwanda (T20)MEDIUM sample
304 runs off 278 balls in 20 T20 matches — strike rate 109.4 vs 97.5 overall, average 16.9 vs 14.0 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
268 runs off 240 balls in 33 T20 matches — strike rate 111.7 vs 97.5 overall, average 14.1 vs 14.0 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
168 runs off 214 balls in 25 T20 matches — strike rate 78.5 vs 97.5 overall, average 12.0 vs 14.0 overall.
- Venue: Bayuemas Oval, Kuala Lumpur (T20)LOW sample
66 runs off 81 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 81.5 vs 97.5 overall, average 16.5 vs 14.0 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Uganda | T20 | 11 | 206 | 176 | 20.6 | 117.0 | 16.5 | 46.6 | MEDIUM |
| Rwanda | T20 | 8 | 86 | 85 | 12.3 | 101.2 | 11.8 | 49.4 | LOW |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 2 | 50 | 55 | 25.0 | 90.9 | 12.7 | 54.5 | LOW |
| Bahrain | T20 | 1 | 30 | 43 | 30.0 | 69.8 | 2.3 | 41.9 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Gahanga International Cricket Stadium. Rwanda | T20 | 20 | 304 | 278 | 16.9 | 109.4 | 13.7 | 47.1 | MEDIUM |
| Bayuemas Oval, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 4 | 66 | 81 | 16.5 | 81.5 | 6.2 | 45.7 | LOW |
| Wanderers Cricket Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 4 | 33 | 45 | 8.3 | 73.3 | 6.7 | 53.3 | LOW |
| Achimota Senior Secondary School A Field, Accra | T20 | 1 | 43 | 40 | 43.0 | 107.5 | 15.0 | 47.5 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 37 | 477 | 489 | 14.0 | 97.5 | 11.2 | 48.9 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 25 | 258 | 258 | 14.3 | 100.0 | 10.5 | 42.6 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 19 | 154 | 159 | 19.3 | 96.9 | 13.8 | 59.7 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 9 | 65 | 72 | 8.1 | 90.3 | 8.3 | 47.2 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 33 | 268 | 240 | 14.1 | 111.7 | 15.4 | 50.8 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 25 | 168 | 214 | 12.0 | 78.5 | 6.5 | 48.6 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 9 | 41 | 35 | 41.0 | 117.1 | 11.4 | 37.1 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.