Mohammed Qasim betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 10 | 291 | 207 | 32.3 | 140.6 | 18.4 | 40.1 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 258 | 276 | 15 | 6.4 | 18.4 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where Mohammed Qasim scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Gibraltar (T20)LOW sample
121 runs off 79 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 153.2 vs 140.6 overall, average 60.5 vs 32.3 overall.
- Venue: Marsa Sports Club (T20)LOW sample
121 runs off 79 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 153.2 vs 140.6 overall, average 60.5 vs 32.3 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)LOW sample
152 runs off 101 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 150.5 vs 140.6 overall, average 21.7 vs 32.3 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)LOW sample
96 runs off 75 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 128.0 vs 140.6 overall, average 32.0 vs 32.3 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)LOW sample
118 runs off 96 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 122.9 vs 140.6 overall, average 118.0 vs 32.3 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Gibraltar | T20 | 2 | 121 | 79 | 60.5 | 153.2 | 20.3 | 34.2 | LOW |
| Austria | T20 | 1 | 58 | 42 | 58.0 | 138.1 | 16.7 | 40.5 | LOW |
Bowling
| Gibraltar | T20 | 72 | 98 | 3 | 8.2 | 32.7 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Marsa Sports Club | T20 | 2 | 121 | 79 | 60.5 | 153.2 | 20.3 | 34.2 | LOW |
| Happy Valley Ground 2 | T20 | 2 | 71 | 51 | 71.0 | 139.2 | 17.6 | 41.2 | LOW |
| Happy Valley Ground | T20 | 3 | 71 | 50 | 23.7 | 142.0 | 20.0 | 46.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| Happy Valley Ground | T20 | 72 | 67 | 4 | 5.6 | 16.8 | LOW |
| Marsa Sports Club | T20 | 72 | 98 | 3 | 8.2 | 32.7 | LOW |
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 66 | 61 | 7 | 5.5 | 8.7 | LOW |
| Happy Valley Ground 2 | T20 | 48 | 50 | 1 | 6.3 | 50.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 10 | 291 | 207 | 32.3 | 140.6 | 18.4 | 40.1 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 258 | 276 | 15 | 6.4 | 18.4 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 8 | 152 | 101 | 21.7 | 150.5 | 18.8 | 35.6 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 7 | 118 | 96 | 118.0 | 122.9 | 17.7 | 46.9 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 198 | 209 | 12 | 6.3 | 17.4 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 42 | 53 | 1 | 7.6 | 53.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 8 | 125 | 91 | 31.3 | 137.4 | 18.7 | 42.9 | LOW |
| SPIN | T20 | 7 | 96 | 75 | 32.0 | 128.0 | 14.7 | 42.7 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 5 | 70 | 41 | 35.0 | 170.7 | 24.4 | 29.3 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.