Muhammad Ajmal betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 7 | 49 | 56 | 8.2 | 87.5 | 10.7 | 48.2 | LOW |
| overall | T20 | 168 | 188 | 7 | 6.7 | 26.9 | MEDIUM |
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
Bowling
| Gibraltar | T20 | 66 | 91 | 1 | 8.3 | 91.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Happy Valley Ground | T20 | 2 | 29 | 35 | 29.0 | 82.9 | 8.6 | 42.9 | LOW |
Bowling
| Happy Valley Ground | T20 | 66 | 72 | 2 | 6.5 | 36.0 | LOW |
| Marsa Sports Club | T20 | 66 | 91 | 1 | 8.3 | 91.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 7 | 49 | 56 | 8.2 | 87.5 | 10.7 | 48.2 | LOW |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 168 | 188 | 7 | 6.7 | 26.9 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 5 | 39 | 42 | 13.0 | 92.9 | 11.9 | 47.6 | LOW |
Bowling
| powerplay | T20 | 78 | 76 | 5 | 5.8 | 15.2 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 48 | 70 | 0 | 8.8 | — | LOW |
| middle | T20 | 42 | 42 | 2 | 6.0 | 21.0 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.