Muhammad Amir betting stats, splits & projections
All-rounder
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 45 | 549 | 523 | 14.4 | 105.0 | 12.4 | 40.3 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 543 | 616 | 41 | 6.8 | 15.0 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where Muhammad Amir scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
258 runs off 225 balls in 21 T20 matches — strike rate 114.7 vs 105.0 overall, average 18.4 vs 14.4 overall.
- Opposition: Bahrain (T20)LOW sample
122 runs off 84 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 145.2 vs 105.0 overall, average 40.7 vs 14.4 overall.
- Venue: Mission Road Ground, Mong Kok, Hong Kong (T20)LOW sample
97 runs off 71 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 136.6 vs 105.0 overall, average 32.3 vs 14.4 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Opposition: Hong Kong (T20)LOW sample
74 runs off 89 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 83.1 vs 105.0 overall, average 8.2 vs 14.4 overall.
- Opposition: Papua New Guinea (T20)LOW sample
67 runs off 71 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 94.4 vs 105.0 overall, average 16.8 vs 14.4 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)LOW sample
73 runs off 81 balls in 15 T20 matches — strike rate 90.1 vs 105.0 overall, average 6.6 vs 14.4 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Hong Kong | T20 | 10 | 74 | 89 | 8.2 | 83.1 | 10.1 | 46.1 | LOW |
| Bahrain | T20 | 5 | 122 | 84 | 40.7 | 145.2 | 19.0 | 25.0 | LOW |
| Papua New Guinea | T20 | 5 | 67 | 71 | 16.8 | 94.4 | 11.3 | 49.3 | LOW |
| Nepal | T20 | 4 | 41 | 52 | 10.3 | 78.8 | 11.5 | 51.9 | LOW |
| Indonesia | T20 | 4 | 59 | 50 | 14.8 | 118.0 | 12.0 | 34.0 | LOW |
Bowling
| Nepal | T20 | 66 | 101 | 5 | 9.2 | 20.2 | LOW |
| Hong Kong | T20 | 54 | 77 | 2 | 8.6 | 38.5 | LOW |
| Singapore | T20 | 54 | 51 | 7 | 5.7 | 7.3 | LOW |
| Bahrain | T20 | 53 | 68 | 3 | 7.7 | 22.7 | LOW |
| Indonesia | T20 | 42 | 39 | 3 | 5.6 | 13.0 | LOW |
| Kuwait | T20 | 42 | 52 | 3 | 7.4 | 17.3 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Bayuemas Oval, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 21 | 274 | 261 | 16.1 | 105.0 | 12.3 | 41.0 | MEDIUM |
| Mission Road Ground, Mong Kok, Hong Kong | T20 | 4 | 97 | 71 | 32.3 | 136.6 | 18.3 | 25.4 | LOW |
| Tribhuvan University International Cricket Ground, Kirtipur | T20 | 5 | 35 | 43 | 7.0 | 81.4 | 9.3 | 51.2 | LOW |
| Al Amerat Cricket Ground Oman Cricket (Ministry Turf 2) | T20 | 2 | 45 | 41 | 22.5 | 109.8 | 9.8 | 34.1 | LOW |
| Selangor Turf Club, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 4 | 27 | 41 | 6.8 | 65.9 | 2.4 | 48.8 | LOW |
Bowling
| Bayuemas Oval, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 163 | 185 | 11 | 6.8 | 16.8 | MEDIUM |
| Tribhuvan University International Cricket Ground, Kirtipur | T20 | 84 | 122 | 10 | 8.7 | 12.2 | LOW |
| Selangor Turf Club, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 72 | 104 | 4 | 8.7 | 26.0 | LOW |
| Terdthai Cricket Ground, Bangkok | T20 | 72 | 48 | 7 | 4.0 | 6.9 | LOW |
| Singapore National Cricket Ground | T20 | 56 | 73 | 5 | 7.8 | 14.6 | LOW |
| Al Amerat Cricket Ground Oman Cricket (Ministry Turf 2) | T20 | 36 | 44 | 3 | 7.3 | 14.7 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 45 | 549 | 523 | 14.4 | 105.0 | 12.4 | 40.3 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 543 | 616 | 41 | 6.8 | 15.0 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 21 | 258 | 225 | 18.4 | 114.7 | 12.4 | 32.9 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 23 | 218 | 217 | 16.8 | 100.5 | 14.3 | 48.8 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 15 | 73 | 81 | 6.6 | 90.1 | 7.4 | 38.3 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 420 | 483 | 31 | 6.9 | 15.6 | HIGH |
| death | T20 | 123 | 133 | 10 | 6.5 | 13.3 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 37 | 271 | 251 | 18.1 | 108.0 | 14.7 | 41.4 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 30 | 249 | 240 | 13.1 | 103.8 | 11.3 | 40.0 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 10 | 29 | 32 | 7.3 | 90.6 | 3.1 | 34.4 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.