Musa Shaheen betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 20 | 465 | 402 | 25.8 | 115.7 | 13.9 | 40.3 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 6 | 10 | 0 | 10.0 | — | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where Musa Shaheen scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Norway (T20)LOW sample
95 runs off 67 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 141.8 vs 115.7 overall, average 47.5 vs 25.8 overall.
- Venue: Koge Cricket Club (T20)LOW sample
109 runs off 78 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 139.7 vs 115.7 overall, average 36.3 vs 25.8 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
174 runs off 153 balls in 14 T20 matches — strike rate 113.7 vs 115.7 overall, average 17.4 vs 25.8 overall.
- Opposition: Germany (T20)LOW sample
80 runs off 87 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 92.0 vs 115.7 overall, average 20.0 vs 25.8 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Germany | T20 | 4 | 80 | 87 | 20.0 | 92.0 | 10.3 | 44.8 | LOW |
| Norway | T20 | 2 | 95 | 67 | 47.5 | 141.8 | 20.9 | 37.3 | LOW |
| Romania | T20 | 1 | 80 | 56 | 80.0 | 142.9 | 17.9 | 30.4 | LOW |
| Estonia | T20 | 1 | 43 | 31 | 43.0 | 138.7 | 16.1 | 38.7 | LOW |
| Hungary | T20 | 1 | 27 | 30 | 27.0 | 90.0 | 6.7 | 46.7 | LOW |
| Turkey | T20 | 1 | 35 | 30 | 35.0 | 116.7 | 16.7 | 40.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Svanholm Park, Brondby | T20 | 11 | 288 | 251 | 32.0 | 114.7 | 13.9 | 39.4 | MEDIUM |
| Koge Cricket Club | T20 | 3 | 109 | 78 | 36.3 | 139.7 | 17.9 | 37.2 | LOW |
| Royal Brussels Cricket Club Ground, Waterloo | T20 | 2 | 30 | 31 | 15.0 | 96.8 | 9.7 | 38.7 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 20 | 465 | 402 | 25.8 | 115.7 | 13.9 | 40.3 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 13 | 248 | 211 | 82.7 | 117.5 | 16.1 | 46.4 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 14 | 174 | 153 | 17.4 | 113.7 | 11.8 | 33.3 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 6 | 43 | 38 | 8.6 | 113.2 | 10.5 | 34.2 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 16 | 238 | 204 | 29.8 | 116.7 | 15.2 | 40.2 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 14 | 144 | 121 | 24.0 | 119.0 | 14.0 | 42.1 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 13 | 83 | 77 | 20.8 | 107.8 | 10.4 | 37.7 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.