Mustafa Omer betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 11 | 280 | 227 | 28.0 | 123.3 | 14.5 | 42.7 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 18 | 28 | 0 | 9.3 | — | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where Mustafa Omer scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample
131 runs off 72 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 181.9 vs 123.3 overall, average 131.0 vs 28.0 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
120 runs off 120 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 100.0 vs 123.3 overall, average 30.0 vs 28.0 overall.
- Opposition: Romania (T20)LOW sample
69 runs off 62 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 111.3 vs 123.3 overall, average 34.5 vs 28.0 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)LOW sample
105 runs off 106 balls in 11 T20 matches — strike rate 99.1 vs 123.3 overall, average 21.0 vs 28.0 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)LOW sample
92 runs off 85 balls in 11 T20 matches — strike rate 108.2 vs 123.3 overall, average 18.4 vs 28.0 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Romania | T20 | 2 | 69 | 62 | 34.5 | 111.3 | 9.7 | 35.5 | LOW |
| Turkey | T20 | 2 | 111 | 53 | 111.0 | 209.4 | 28.3 | 26.4 | LOW |
| Malta | T20 | 1 | 33 | 33 | 33.0 | 100.0 | 12.1 | 48.5 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 9 | 260 | 199 | 32.5 | 130.7 | 15.6 | 39.7 | MEDIUM |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 11 | 280 | 227 | 28.0 | 123.3 | 14.5 | 42.7 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 6 | 120 | 120 | 30.0 | 100.0 | 8.3 | 40.0 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 11 | 92 | 85 | 18.4 | 108.2 | 15.3 | 49.4 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 11 | 105 | 106 | 21.0 | 99.1 | 11.3 | 48.1 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 4 | 131 | 72 | 131.0 | 181.9 | 25.0 | 33.3 | LOW |
| SPIN | T20 | 4 | 44 | 49 | 11.0 | 89.8 | 6.1 | 44.9 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.