MW Harvey betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | LIST_A | 25 | 891 | 986 | 38.7 | 90.4 | 12.5 | 54.9 | HIGH |
| overall | FIRST_CLASS | 10 | 350 | 680 | 21.9 | 51.5 | 7.6 | 75.9 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 20 | 214 | 210 | 12.6 | 101.9 | 11.4 | 41.4 | MEDIUM |
| overall | LIST_A | 38 | 61 | 0 | 9.6 | — | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where MW Harvey scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: PACE (LIST A)HIGH sample
603 runs off 663 balls in 25 LIST A matches — strike rate 91.0 vs 90.4 overall, average 50.3 vs 38.7 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (LIST A)HIGH sample
472 runs off 538 balls in 23 LIST A matches — strike rate 87.7 vs 90.4 overall, average 52.4 vs 38.7 overall.
- Phase: new_ball (FIRST CLASS)HIGH sample
252 runs off 384 balls in 10 FIRST CLASS matches — strike rate 65.6 vs 51.5 overall, average 18.0 vs 21.9 overall.
- Opposition: Victoria (LIST A)MEDIUM sample
177 runs off 150 balls in 3 LIST A matches — strike rate 118.0 vs 90.4 overall, average 88.5 vs 38.7 overall.
- Opposition: Victoria (FIRST CLASS)MEDIUM sample
90 runs off 142 balls in 4 FIRST CLASS matches — strike rate 63.4 vs 51.5 overall, average 11.3 vs 21.9 overall.
- Venue: Karen Rolton Oval, Adelaide (LIST A)MEDIUM sample
323 runs off 298 balls in 4 LIST A matches — strike rate 108.4 vs 90.4 overall, average 161.5 vs 38.7 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Opposition: New South Wales (FIRST CLASS)HIGH sample
126 runs off 342 balls in 2 FIRST CLASS matches — strike rate 36.8 vs 51.5 overall, average 63.0 vs 21.9 overall.
- Venue: Sydney Cricket Ground (FIRST CLASS)HIGH sample
126 runs off 342 balls in 2 FIRST CLASS matches — strike rate 36.8 vs 51.5 overall, average 63.0 vs 21.9 overall.
- Phase: middle (LIST A)HIGH sample
419 runs off 448 balls in 16 LIST A matches — strike rate 93.5 vs 90.4 overall, average 29.9 vs 38.7 overall.
- Opposition: Tasmania (LIST A)MEDIUM sample
170 runs off 214 balls in 5 LIST A matches — strike rate 79.4 vs 90.4 overall, average 34.0 vs 38.7 overall.
- Opposition: Western Australia (LIST A)MEDIUM sample
174 runs off 214 balls in 7 LIST A matches — strike rate 81.3 vs 90.4 overall, average 24.9 vs 38.7 overall.
- Opposition: New South Wales (LIST A)MEDIUM sample
151 runs off 175 balls in 5 LIST A matches — strike rate 86.3 vs 90.4 overall, average 30.2 vs 38.7 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| New South Wales | FIRST_CLASS | 2 | 126 | 342 | 63.0 | 36.8 | 5.3 | 81.3 | HIGH |
| Tasmania | LIST_A | 5 | 170 | 214 | 34.0 | 79.4 | 10.7 | 57.9 | MEDIUM |
| Western Australia | LIST_A | 7 | 174 | 214 | 24.9 | 81.3 | 10.7 | 62.6 | MEDIUM |
| New South Wales | LIST_A | 5 | 151 | 175 | 30.2 | 86.3 | 10.9 | 53.7 | MEDIUM |
| Queensland | LIST_A | 4 | 158 | 162 | 52.7 | 97.5 | 14.8 | 55.6 | MEDIUM |
| Victoria | LIST_A | 3 | 177 | 150 | 88.5 | 118.0 | 18.0 | 42.7 | MEDIUM |
| Victoria | FIRST_CLASS | 4 | 90 | 142 | 11.3 | 63.4 | 9.9 | 71.8 | MEDIUM |
| Queensland | FIRST_CLASS | 2 | 74 | 130 | 18.5 | 56.9 | 6.2 | 72.3 | MEDIUM |
| South Australia | LIST_A | 1 | 61 | 71 | 61.0 | 85.9 | 9.9 | 49.3 | LOW |
| Melbourne Stars | T20 | 4 | 81 | 71 | 40.5 | 114.1 | 12.7 | 33.8 | LOW |
| Tasmania | FIRST_CLASS | 2 | 60 | 66 | 30.0 | 90.9 | 18.2 | 63.6 | LOW |
| Sydney Thunder | T20 | 3 | 49 | 46 | 16.3 | 106.5 | 15.2 | 43.5 | LOW |
| Perth Scorchers | T20 | 4 | 37 | 34 | 9.3 | 108.8 | 11.8 | 38.2 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Sydney Cricket Ground | FIRST_CLASS | 2 | 126 | 342 | 63.0 | 36.8 | 5.3 | 81.3 | HIGH |
| Karen Rolton Oval, Adelaide | LIST_A | 4 | 323 | 298 | 161.5 | 108.4 | 15.8 | 45.6 | MEDIUM |
| Adelaide Oval | LIST_A | 4 | 173 | 160 | 43.3 | 108.1 | 15.6 | 48.1 | MEDIUM |
| Junction Oval, Melbourne | LIST_A | 6 | 107 | 158 | 17.8 | 67.7 | 8.2 | 67.1 | MEDIUM |
| Junction Oval, Melbourne | FIRST_CLASS | 4 | 90 | 142 | 11.3 | 63.4 | 9.9 | 71.8 | MEDIUM |
| Brisbane Cricket Ground, Woolloongabba, Brisbane | FIRST_CLASS | 2 | 74 | 130 | 18.5 | 56.9 | 6.2 | 72.3 | MEDIUM |
| Cricket Central, Sydney | LIST_A | 3 | 91 | 104 | 30.3 | 87.5 | 10.6 | 54.8 | LOW |
| Sydney Cricket Ground | LIST_A | 1 | 55 | 72 | 55.0 | 76.4 | 8.3 | 52.8 | LOW |
| Adelaide Oval | FIRST_CLASS | 2 | 60 | 66 | 30.0 | 90.9 | 18.2 | 63.6 | LOW |
| Brisbane Cricket Ground, Woolloongabba, Brisbane | LIST_A | 1 | 72 | 66 | 72.0 | 109.1 | 16.7 | 51.5 | LOW |
| Melbourne Cricket Ground | T20 | 3 | 73 | 64 | 73.0 | 114.1 | 12.5 | 34.4 | LOW |
| Kingston Twin Ovals, Hobart | LIST_A | 1 | 32 | 53 | 32.0 | 60.4 | 9.4 | 67.9 | LOW |
| Adelaide Oval | T20 | 3 | 50 | 47 | 16.7 | 106.4 | 14.9 | 40.4 | LOW |
| Docklands Stadium, Melbourne | T20 | 6 | 43 | 47 | 7.2 | 91.5 | 8.5 | 42.6 | LOW |
| Western Australia Cricket Association Ground, Perth | LIST_A | 2 | 30 | 40 | 15.0 | 75.0 | 12.5 | 72.5 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | LIST_A | 25 | 891 | 986 | 38.7 | 90.4 | 12.5 | 54.9 | HIGH |
| Unknown | FIRST_CLASS | 10 | 350 | 680 | 21.9 | 51.5 | 7.6 | 75.9 | HIGH |
| Unknown | T20 | 20 | 214 | 210 | 12.6 | 101.9 | 11.4 | 41.4 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| Unknown | LIST_A | 38 | 61 | 0 | 9.6 | — | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | LIST_A | 23 | 472 | 538 | 52.4 | 87.7 | 13.0 | 58.9 | HIGH |
| middle | LIST_A | 16 | 419 | 448 | 29.9 | 93.5 | 11.8 | 50.0 | HIGH |
| new_ball | FIRST_CLASS | 10 | 252 | 384 | 18.0 | 65.6 | 9.9 | 69.3 | HIGH |
| old_ball | FIRST_CLASS | 4 | 98 | 296 | 49.0 | 33.1 | 4.7 | 84.5 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 16 | 126 | 138 | 11.5 | 91.3 | 8.7 | 42.0 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 5 | 45 | 38 | 15.0 | 118.4 | 18.4 | 44.7 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 5 | 43 | 34 | 14.3 | 126.5 | 14.7 | 35.3 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | LIST_A | 36 | 54 | 0 | 9.0 | — | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | LIST_A | 25 | 603 | 663 | 50.3 | 91.0 | 13.6 | 57.9 | HIGH |
| PACE | FIRST_CLASS | 10 | 232 | 400 | 23.2 | 58.0 | 8.5 | 71.5 | HIGH |
| SPIN | LIST_A | 17 | 207 | 251 | 23.0 | 82.5 | 8.8 | 49.4 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | FIRST_CLASS | 4 | 64 | 196 | 16.0 | 32.7 | 6.1 | 86.7 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | T20 | 18 | 135 | 123 | 10.4 | 109.8 | 13.8 | 43.9 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | FIRST_CLASS | 6 | 54 | 84 | 27.0 | 64.3 | 7.1 | 71.4 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | LIST_A | 8 | 81 | 72 | 40.5 | 112.5 | 15.3 | 45.8 | LOW |
| SPIN | T20 | 15 | 59 | 69 | 19.7 | 85.5 | 7.2 | 39.1 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.