N Chantam betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 74 | 1711 | 1635 | 31.7 | 104.6 | 13.9 | 48.0 | HIGH |
| overall | ODI | 14 | 630 | 880 | 45.0 | 71.6 | 9.1 | 62.8 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where N Chantam scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Netherlands (ODI)HIGH sample
396 runs off 564 balls in 6 ODI matches — strike rate 70.2 vs 71.6 overall, average 66.0 vs 45.0 overall.
- Venue: Terdthai Cricket Ground, Bangkok (T20)HIGH sample
574 runs off 446 balls in 20 T20 matches — strike rate 128.7 vs 104.6 overall, average 44.2 vs 31.7 overall.
- Venue: Royal Chiangmai Golf Club (ODI)HIGH sample
267 runs off 357 balls in 4 ODI matches — strike rate 74.8 vs 71.6 overall, average 66.8 vs 45.0 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)HIGH sample
641 runs off 567 balls in 58 T20 matches — strike rate 113.1 vs 104.6 overall, average 32.0 vs 31.7 overall.
- Opposition: Hong Kong (T20)MEDIUM sample
158 runs off 122 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 129.5 vs 104.6 overall, average 79.0 vs 31.7 overall.
- Venue: Bayuemas Oval, Kuala Lumpur (T20)MEDIUM sample
275 runs off 218 balls in 11 T20 matches — strike rate 126.1 vs 104.6 overall, average 34.4 vs 31.7 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)HIGH sample
853 runs off 907 balls in 61 T20 matches — strike rate 94.0 vs 104.6 overall, average 25.8 vs 31.7 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (ODI)HIGH sample
264 runs off 416 balls in 13 ODI matches — strike rate 63.5 vs 71.6 overall, average 52.8 vs 45.0 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)HIGH sample
663 runs off 734 balls in 60 T20 matches — strike rate 90.3 vs 104.6 overall, average 28.8 vs 31.7 overall.
- Opposition: Netherlands (T20)MEDIUM sample
241 runs off 286 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 84.3 vs 104.6 overall, average 34.4 vs 31.7 overall.
- Opposition: United Arab Emirates (T20)MEDIUM sample
146 runs off 139 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 105.0 vs 104.6 overall, average 20.9 vs 31.7 overall.
- Venue: VRA Ground, Amstelveen (ODI)MEDIUM sample
129 runs off 207 balls in 2 ODI matches — strike rate 62.3 vs 71.6 overall, average 64.5 vs 45.0 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Netherlands | ODI | 6 | 396 | 564 | 66.0 | 70.2 | 8.2 | 62.9 | HIGH |
| Netherlands | T20 | 10 | 241 | 286 | 34.4 | 84.3 | 11.2 | 54.9 | MEDIUM |
| United Arab Emirates | T20 | 8 | 146 | 139 | 20.9 | 105.0 | 10.8 | 43.9 | MEDIUM |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 6 | 135 | 132 | 27.0 | 102.3 | 15.9 | 51.5 | MEDIUM |
| Bangladesh | T20 | 3 | 130 | 130 | 43.3 | 100.0 | 10.8 | 44.6 | MEDIUM |
| Hong Kong | T20 | 3 | 158 | 122 | 79.0 | 129.5 | 16.4 | 36.1 | MEDIUM |
| West Indies | ODI | 1 | 66 | 98 | 66.0 | 67.3 | 7.1 | 59.2 | LOW |
| Nepal | T20 | 5 | 104 | 98 | 34.7 | 106.1 | 14.3 | 44.9 | LOW |
| Zimbabwe | ODI | 3 | 77 | 95 | 25.7 | 81.1 | 14.7 | 65.3 | LOW |
| Malaysia | T20 | 5 | 100 | 78 | 25.0 | 128.2 | 16.7 | 38.5 | LOW |
| Pakistan | T20 | 2 | 75 | 78 | 37.5 | 96.2 | 10.3 | 51.3 | LOW |
| Namibia | T20 | 2 | 76 | 75 | 76.0 | 101.3 | 10.7 | 44.0 | LOW |
| Scotland | T20 | 5 | 81 | 75 | 16.2 | 108.0 | 14.7 | 52.0 | LOW |
| Singapore | T20 | 1 | 148 | 69 | — | 214.5 | 39.1 | 21.7 | LOW |
| Papua New Guinea | T20 | 2 | 59 | 64 | 59.0 | 92.2 | 10.9 | 48.4 | LOW |
| Scotland | ODI | 1 | 63 | 58 | 63.0 | 108.6 | 15.5 | 48.3 | LOW |
| Uganda | T20 | 2 | 38 | 44 | — | 86.4 | 13.6 | 61.4 | LOW |
| Pakistan | ODI | 1 | 13 | 34 | 13.0 | 38.2 | 5.9 | 79.4 | LOW |
| Sri Lanka | T20 | 3 | 12 | 33 | 4.0 | 36.4 | 0.0 | 63.6 | LOW |
| Kuwait | T20 | 1 | 21 | 31 | — | 67.7 | 6.5 | 58.1 | LOW |
| Tanzania | T20 | 1 | 27 | 31 | 27.0 | 87.1 | 12.9 | 54.8 | LOW |
| India | T20 | 3 | 14 | 30 | 4.7 | 46.7 | 6.7 | 76.7 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Terdthai Cricket Ground, Bangkok | T20 | 20 | 574 | 446 | 44.2 | 128.7 | 19.5 | 42.2 | HIGH |
| Royal Chiangmai Golf Club | ODI | 4 | 267 | 357 | 66.8 | 74.8 | 9.0 | 62.5 | HIGH |
| Bayuemas Oval, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 11 | 275 | 218 | 34.4 | 126.1 | 16.5 | 36.2 | MEDIUM |
| VRA Ground, Amstelveen | ODI | 2 | 129 | 207 | 64.5 | 62.3 | 6.8 | 63.8 | MEDIUM |
| Gaddafi Stadium, Lahore | ODI | 2 | 79 | 132 | 39.5 | 59.8 | 6.8 | 64.4 | MEDIUM |
| Sheikh Zayed Stadium, Abu Dhabi | T20 | 4 | 139 | 126 | 34.8 | 110.3 | 12.7 | 41.3 | MEDIUM |
| Tribhuvan University International Cricket Ground, Kirtipur | T20 | 6 | 125 | 125 | 41.7 | 100.0 | 16.0 | 52.8 | MEDIUM |
| Royal Chiangmai Golf Club | T20 | 4 | 84 | 114 | 28.0 | 73.7 | 8.8 | 56.1 | LOW |
| Sylhet International Cricket Stadium | T20 | 5 | 93 | 103 | 18.6 | 90.3 | 9.7 | 53.4 | LOW |
| Terdthai Cricket Ground, Bangkok | ODI | 3 | 77 | 95 | 25.7 | 81.1 | 14.7 | 65.3 | LOW |
| UKM-YSD Cricket Oval, Bangi | T20 | 3 | 65 | 94 | 32.5 | 69.1 | 5.3 | 56.4 | LOW |
| Mulpani Cricket Ground | T20 | 4 | 102 | 90 | 25.5 | 113.3 | 18.9 | 51.1 | LOW |
| Lahore City Cricket Association Ground | ODI | 3 | 78 | 89 | 26.0 | 87.6 | 12.4 | 57.3 | LOW |
| Sportpark Maarschalkerweerd, Utrecht | T20 | 4 | 67 | 78 | 16.8 | 85.9 | 10.3 | 59.0 | LOW |
| Asian Institute of Technology Ground, Bangkok | T20 | 3 | 78 | 67 | 78.0 | 116.4 | 14.9 | 44.8 | LOW |
| Tolerance Oval, Abu Dhabi | T20 | 2 | 39 | 60 | 39.0 | 65.0 | 8.3 | 63.3 | LOW |
| Sylhet International Cricket Stadium, Academy Ground | T20 | 2 | 27 | 50 | 13.5 | 54.0 | 0.0 | 52.0 | LOW |
| Dubai International Cricket Stadium | T20 | 2 | 18 | 32 | 9.0 | 56.3 | 6.3 | 71.9 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 74 | 1711 | 1635 | 31.7 | 104.6 | 13.9 | 48.0 | HIGH |
| Unknown | ODI | 14 | 630 | 880 | 45.0 | 71.6 | 9.1 | 62.8 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 60 | 663 | 734 | 28.8 | 90.3 | 13.4 | 57.4 | HIGH |
| middle | T20 | 46 | 668 | 681 | 30.4 | 98.1 | 11.3 | 44.8 | HIGH |
| middle | ODI | 12 | 421 | 595 | 42.1 | 70.8 | 8.6 | 60.5 | HIGH |
| powerplay | ODI | 11 | 175 | 247 | 87.5 | 70.9 | 10.5 | 70.9 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 20 | 380 | 220 | 42.2 | 172.7 | 24.1 | 26.4 | MEDIUM |
| death | ODI | 2 | 34 | 38 | 17.0 | 89.5 | 7.9 | 47.4 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 61 | 853 | 907 | 25.8 | 94.0 | 11.7 | 50.7 | HIGH |
| PACE | T20 | 58 | 641 | 567 | 32.0 | 113.1 | 16.8 | 46.7 | HIGH |
| SPIN | ODI | 13 | 264 | 416 | 52.8 | 63.5 | 7.7 | 66.1 | HIGH |
| PACE | ODI | 13 | 264 | 346 | 52.8 | 76.3 | 10.4 | 62.1 | HIGH |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 22 | 217 | 161 | 217.0 | 134.8 | 16.8 | 36.6 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | ODI | 9 | 102 | 118 | 25.5 | 86.4 | 10.2 | 53.4 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.