N Choden betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 32 | 532 | 724 | 18.3 | 73.5 | 7.7 | 56.5 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 150 | 107 | 10 | 4.3 | 10.7 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where N Choden scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Venue: Gelephu International Cricket Ground (T20)HIGH sample
288 runs off 322 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 89.4 vs 73.5 overall, average 41.1 vs 18.3 overall.
- Opposition: Malaysia (T20)MEDIUM sample
159 runs off 172 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 92.4 vs 73.5 overall, average 159.0 vs 18.3 overall.
- Opposition: Kuwait (T20)LOW sample
54 runs off 66 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 81.8 vs 73.5 overall, average 18.0 vs 18.3 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Opposition: Nepal (T20)LOW sample
33 runs off 68 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 48.5 vs 73.5 overall, average 8.3 vs 18.3 overall.
- Opposition: Qatar (T20)LOW sample
39 runs off 63 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 61.9 vs 73.5 overall, average 19.5 vs 18.3 overall.
- Venue: Bayuemas Oval, Kuala Lumpur (T20)LOW sample
44 runs off 95 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 46.3 vs 73.5 overall, average 22.0 vs 18.3 overall.
- Venue: Udayana Cricket Ground (T20)LOW sample
40 runs off 68 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 58.8 vs 73.5 overall, average 8.0 vs 18.3 overall.
- Venue: UKM-YSD Cricket Oval, Bangi (T20)LOW sample
32 runs off 64 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 50.0 vs 73.5 overall, average 8.0 vs 18.3 overall.
- Venue: Selangor Turf Club, Kuala Lumpur (T20)LOW sample
30 runs off 61 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 49.2 vs 73.5 overall, average 10.0 vs 18.3 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Malaysia | T20 | 4 | 159 | 172 | 159.0 | 92.4 | 14.0 | 55.2 | MEDIUM |
| Myanmar | T20 | 4 | 94 | 118 | 23.5 | 79.7 | 7.6 | 49.2 | LOW |
| Hong Kong | T20 | 6 | 87 | 112 | 14.5 | 77.7 | 11.6 | 57.1 | LOW |
| Nepal | T20 | 4 | 33 | 68 | 8.3 | 48.5 | 1.5 | 61.8 | LOW |
| Kuwait | T20 | 3 | 54 | 66 | 18.0 | 81.8 | 7.6 | 48.5 | LOW |
| Qatar | T20 | 2 | 39 | 63 | 19.5 | 61.9 | 4.8 | 63.5 | LOW |
| Indonesia | T20 | 3 | 21 | 40 | 7.0 | 52.5 | 0.0 | 55.0 | LOW |
| Bahrain | T20 | 1 | 14 | 33 | 14.0 | 42.4 | 0.0 | 69.7 | LOW |
Bowling
| Myanmar | T20 | 36 | 34 | 3 | 5.7 | 11.3 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Gelephu International Cricket Ground | T20 | 10 | 288 | 322 | 41.1 | 89.4 | 12.1 | 51.6 | HIGH |
| Bayuemas Oval, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 2 | 44 | 95 | 22.0 | 46.3 | 1.1 | 65.3 | LOW |
| Udayana Cricket Ground | T20 | 5 | 40 | 68 | 8.0 | 58.8 | 0.0 | 57.4 | LOW |
| UKM-YSD Cricket Oval, Bangi | T20 | 4 | 32 | 64 | 8.0 | 50.0 | 1.6 | 64.1 | LOW |
| Selangor Turf Club, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 3 | 30 | 61 | 10.0 | 49.2 | 4.9 | 68.9 | LOW |
| Kolej Tuanku Jaafar Cricket Oval, Mantin | T20 | 3 | 39 | 40 | 13.0 | 97.5 | 15.0 | 52.5 | LOW |
| Terdthai Cricket Ground, Bangkok | T20 | 3 | 27 | 36 | 9.0 | 75.0 | 5.6 | 47.2 | LOW |
| Kinrara Academy Oval, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 1 | 28 | 34 | 28.0 | 82.4 | 8.8 | 52.9 | LOW |
Bowling
| Selangor Turf Club, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 48 | 24 | 3 | 3.0 | 8.0 | LOW |
| Udayana Cricket Ground | T20 | 42 | 29 | 3 | 4.1 | 9.7 | LOW |
| Gelephu International Cricket Ground | T20 | 36 | 34 | 3 | 5.7 | 11.3 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 32 | 532 | 724 | 18.3 | 73.5 | 7.7 | 56.5 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 150 | 107 | 10 | 4.3 | 10.7 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 32 | 274 | 406 | 18.3 | 67.5 | 8.1 | 62.3 | HIGH |
| middle | T20 | 17 | 205 | 260 | 20.5 | 78.8 | 6.5 | 49.2 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 5 | 53 | 58 | 13.3 | 91.4 | 10.3 | 48.3 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 126 | 89 | 9 | 4.2 | 9.9 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 27 | 263 | 369 | 15.5 | 71.3 | 7.9 | 59.9 | HIGH |
| SPIN | T20 | 21 | 171 | 223 | 17.1 | 76.7 | 7.6 | 52.0 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 13 | 98 | 132 | 49.0 | 74.2 | 7.6 | 54.5 | MEDIUM |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.