N Davin betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 23 | 672 | 514 | 35.4 | 130.7 | 18.3 | 40.9 | HIGH |
| overall | ODI | 12 | 165 | 205 | 13.8 | 80.5 | 10.7 | 62.0 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where N Davin scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)HIGH sample
423 runs off 320 balls in 23 T20 matches — strike rate 132.2 vs 130.7 overall, average 47.0 vs 35.4 overall.
- Opposition: Zimbabwe (T20)MEDIUM sample
330 runs off 220 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 150.0 vs 130.7 overall, average 47.1 vs 35.4 overall.
- Venue: Wanderers Cricket Ground, Windhoek (T20)MEDIUM sample
362 runs off 238 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 152.1 vs 130.7 overall, average 60.3 vs 35.4 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (ODI)MEDIUM sample
143 runs off 164 balls in 12 ODI matches — strike rate 87.2 vs 80.5 overall, average 23.8 vs 13.8 overall.
- Opposition: Canada (ODI)LOW sample
92 runs off 102 balls in 3 ODI matches — strike rate 90.2 vs 80.5 overall, average 30.7 vs 13.8 overall.
- Opposition: Canada (T20)LOW sample
88 runs off 62 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 141.9 vs 130.7 overall, average 88.0 vs 35.4 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Opposition: Netherlands (ODI)LOW sample
38 runs off 61 balls in 4 ODI matches — strike rate 62.3 vs 80.5 overall, average 9.5 vs 13.8 overall.
- Venue: United Cricket Club Ground, Windhoek (T20)LOW sample
82 runs off 70 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 117.1 vs 130.7 overall, average 20.5 vs 35.4 overall.
- Venue: Achimota Senior Secondary School A Field, Accra (T20)LOW sample
63 runs off 60 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 105.0 vs 130.7 overall, average 21.0 vs 35.4 overall.
Current projections
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 8 | 330 | 220 | 47.1 | 150.0 | 22.3 | 35.5 | MEDIUM |
| Canada | ODI | 3 | 92 | 102 | 30.7 | 90.2 | 10.8 | 52.0 | LOW |
| Canada | T20 | 3 | 88 | 62 | 88.0 | 141.9 | 16.1 | 29.0 | LOW |
| Netherlands | ODI | 4 | 38 | 61 | 9.5 | 62.3 | 8.2 | 72.1 | LOW |
| Rwanda | T20 | 1 | 80 | 59 | 80.0 | 135.6 | 16.9 | 37.3 | LOW |
| Uganda | T20 | 2 | 48 | 47 | 24.0 | 102.1 | 14.9 | 51.1 | LOW |
| Oman | T20 | 1 | 24 | 31 | 24.0 | 77.4 | 9.7 | 64.5 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Wanderers Cricket Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 7 | 362 | 238 | 60.3 | 152.1 | 21.8 | 34.5 | MEDIUM |
| Wanderers Cricket Ground, Windhoek | ODI | 7 | 128 | 159 | 18.3 | 80.5 | 10.1 | 59.7 | MEDIUM |
| United Cricket Club Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 4 | 82 | 70 | 20.5 | 117.1 | 18.6 | 51.4 | LOW |
| Namibia Cricket Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 3 | 88 | 62 | 88.0 | 141.9 | 16.1 | 29.0 | LOW |
| Achimota Senior Secondary School A Field, Accra | T20 | 3 | 63 | 60 | 21.0 | 105.0 | 15.0 | 45.0 | LOW |
| Kensington Oval, Bridgetown, Barbados | T20 | 2 | 44 | 43 | 22.0 | 102.3 | 16.3 | 55.8 | LOW |
| Tribhuvan University International Cricket Ground, Kirtipur | ODI | 4 | 36 | 41 | 9.0 | 87.8 | 14.6 | 68.3 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 23 | 672 | 514 | 35.4 | 130.7 | 18.3 | 40.9 | HIGH |
| Unknown | ODI | 12 | 165 | 205 | 13.8 | 80.5 | 10.7 | 62.0 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 23 | 423 | 320 | 47.0 | 132.2 | 21.3 | 46.9 | HIGH |
| powerplay | ODI | 12 | 142 | 176 | 14.2 | 80.7 | 11.4 | 64.2 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 12 | 226 | 172 | 28.3 | 131.4 | 14.0 | 30.8 | MEDIUM |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 23 | 354 | 285 | 29.5 | 124.2 | 18.2 | 43.5 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 19 | 223 | 167 | 31.9 | 133.5 | 16.2 | 35.9 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | ODI | 12 | 143 | 164 | 23.8 | 87.2 | 12.8 | 63.4 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 6 | 95 | 62 | — | 153.2 | 24.2 | 41.9 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.