N Vare betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 38 | 675 | 913 | 23.3 | 73.9 | 9.0 | 59.7 | HIGH |
| overall | ODI | 8 | 138 | 307 | 17.3 | 45.0 | 3.6 | 70.0 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 6 | 11 | 0 | 11.0 | — | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where N Vare scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Phase: middle (T20)HIGH sample
269 runs off 360 balls in 21 T20 matches — strike rate 74.7 vs 73.9 overall, average 33.6 vs 23.3 overall.
- Venue: Terdthai Cricket Ground, Bangkok (T20)MEDIUM sample
141 runs off 203 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 69.5 vs 73.9 overall, average 35.3 vs 23.3 overall.
- Venue: Albert Park 1, Suva (T20)MEDIUM sample
147 runs off 131 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 112.2 vs 73.9 overall, average 73.5 vs 23.3 overall.
- Phase: middle (ODI)MEDIUM sample
74 runs off 132 balls in 4 ODI matches — strike rate 56.1 vs 45.0 overall, average 18.5 vs 17.3 overall.
- Opposition: Cook Islands (T20)LOW sample
75 runs off 64 balls in 1 T20 match — strike rate 117.2 vs 73.9 overall, not yet dismissed vs 23.3 overall.
- Venue: Vanuatu Cricket Ground (T20)LOW sample
108 runs off 118 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 91.5 vs 73.9 overall, average 36.0 vs 23.3 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)HIGH sample
280 runs off 450 balls in 33 T20 matches — strike rate 62.2 vs 73.9 overall, average 18.7 vs 23.3 overall.
- Venue: Amini Park, Port Moresby (T20)MEDIUM sample
92 runs off 149 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 61.7 vs 73.9 overall, average 23.0 vs 23.3 overall.
- Phase: powerplay (ODI)MEDIUM sample
64 runs off 175 balls in 8 ODI matches — strike rate 36.6 vs 45.0 overall, average 16.0 vs 17.3 overall.
- Opposition: Zimbabwe (T20)LOW sample
52 runs off 104 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 50.0 vs 73.9 overall, average 17.3 vs 23.3 overall.
- Opposition: Namibia (T20)LOW sample
40 runs off 93 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 43.0 vs 73.9 overall, average 20.0 vs 23.3 overall.
- Venue: Harare Sports Club (T20)LOW sample
42 runs off 89 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 47.2 vs 73.9 overall, average 21.0 vs 23.3 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Scotland | ODI | 3 | 77 | 155 | 25.7 | 49.7 | 4.5 | 69.7 | MEDIUM |
| Thailand | T20 | 4 | 90 | 115 | 45.0 | 78.3 | 10.4 | 61.7 | LOW |
| Samoa | T20 | 4 | 79 | 105 | 26.3 | 75.2 | 7.6 | 59.0 | LOW |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 4 | 52 | 104 | 17.3 | 50.0 | 4.8 | 68.3 | LOW |
| Netherlands | ODI | 2 | 42 | 98 | 21.0 | 42.9 | 2.0 | 66.3 | LOW |
| Vanuatu | T20 | 4 | 74 | 98 | 24.7 | 75.5 | 11.2 | 64.3 | LOW |
| Namibia | T20 | 3 | 40 | 93 | 20.0 | 43.0 | 3.2 | 67.7 | LOW |
| Cook Islands | T20 | 1 | 75 | 64 | — | 117.2 | 12.5 | 34.4 | LOW |
| Netherlands | T20 | 1 | 45 | 55 | — | 81.8 | 12.7 | 58.2 | LOW |
| Indonesia | T20 | 2 | 40 | 53 | 20.0 | 75.5 | 9.4 | 54.7 | LOW |
| Scotland | T20 | 4 | 34 | 51 | 8.5 | 66.7 | 9.8 | 68.6 | LOW |
| Japan | T20 | 1 | 43 | 49 | 43.0 | 87.8 | 6.1 | 44.9 | LOW |
| Philippines | T20 | 1 | 55 | 43 | 55.0 | 127.9 | 20.9 | 44.2 | LOW |
| Zimbabwe | ODI | 2 | 16 | 38 | 8.0 | 42.1 | 5.3 | 73.7 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Terdthai Cricket Ground, Bangkok | T20 | 7 | 141 | 203 | 35.3 | 69.5 | 10.3 | 65.0 | MEDIUM |
| Amini Park, Port Moresby | T20 | 6 | 92 | 149 | 23.0 | 61.7 | 5.4 | 61.1 | MEDIUM |
| VRA Ground, Amstelveen | ODI | 2 | 65 | 141 | 32.5 | 46.1 | 3.5 | 67.4 | MEDIUM |
| Albert Park 1, Suva | T20 | 3 | 147 | 131 | 73.5 | 112.2 | 17.6 | 50.4 | MEDIUM |
| Vanuatu Cricket Ground | T20 | 4 | 108 | 118 | 36.0 | 91.5 | 10.2 | 50.8 | LOW |
| Sportpark Maarschalkerweerd, Utrecht | ODI | 2 | 51 | 100 | 25.5 | 51.0 | 4.0 | 68.0 | LOW |
| Harare Sports Club | T20 | 3 | 42 | 89 | 21.0 | 47.2 | 3.4 | 67.4 | LOW |
| Tolerance Oval, Abu Dhabi | T20 | 4 | 45 | 60 | 11.3 | 75.0 | 13.3 | 68.3 | LOW |
| Asian Institute of Technology Ground, Bangkok | T20 | 3 | 29 | 58 | 9.7 | 50.0 | 3.4 | 65.5 | LOW |
| Albert Park 2, Suva | T20 | 2 | 45 | 57 | 22.5 | 78.9 | 5.3 | 49.1 | LOW |
| Harare Sports Club | ODI | 2 | 16 | 38 | 8.0 | 42.1 | 5.3 | 73.7 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 35 | 633 | 824 | 23.4 | 76.8 | 9.6 | 58.9 | HIGH |
| Unknown | ODI | 6 | 122 | 269 | 20.3 | 45.4 | 3.3 | 69.5 | MEDIUM |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 3 | 42 | 89 | 21.0 | 47.2 | 3.4 | 67.4 | LOW |
| Zimbabwe | ODI | 2 | 16 | 38 | 8.0 | 42.1 | 5.3 | 73.7 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 33 | 280 | 450 | 18.7 | 62.2 | 8.4 | 68.7 | HIGH |
| middle | T20 | 21 | 269 | 360 | 33.6 | 74.7 | 7.5 | 54.4 | HIGH |
| powerplay | ODI | 8 | 64 | 175 | 16.0 | 36.6 | 2.3 | 72.6 | MEDIUM |
| middle | ODI | 4 | 74 | 132 | 18.5 | 56.1 | 5.3 | 66.7 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 13 | 126 | 103 | 21.0 | 122.3 | 16.5 | 38.8 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 30 | 326 | 459 | 27.2 | 71.0 | 9.2 | 61.7 | HIGH |
| SPIN | T20 | 27 | 276 | 362 | 19.7 | 76.2 | 9.1 | 58.0 | HIGH |
| SPIN | ODI | 7 | 75 | 164 | 18.8 | 45.7 | 4.3 | 72.6 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | ODI | 7 | 61 | 133 | 20.3 | 45.9 | 3.0 | 66.2 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 12 | 73 | 92 | 24.3 | 79.3 | 7.6 | 56.5 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.