Nayab Razwan betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 16 | 119 | 178 | 8.5 | 66.9 | 2.8 | 54.5 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 104 | 102 | 5 | 5.9 | 20.4 | LOW |
Why we like it
Splits where Nayab Razwan scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Phase: middle (T20)LOW sample
64 runs off 85 balls in 10 T20 matches — strike rate 75.3 vs 66.9 overall, average 9.1 vs 8.5 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
No split is materially below their own format baseline.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Denmark | T20 | 2 | 8 | 36 | 4.0 | 22.2 | 0.0 | 80.6 | LOW |
Bowling
| Luxembourg | T20 | 48 | 49 | 1 | 6.1 | 49.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Ekeberg Cricket Ground 1, Oslo | T20 | 3 | 36 | 60 | 12.0 | 60.0 | 3.3 | 58.3 | LOW |
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 5 | 36 | 47 | 12.0 | 76.6 | 2.1 | 51.1 | LOW |
| Banks Field, Vinor | T20 | 4 | 32 | 30 | 8.0 | 106.7 | 6.7 | 36.7 | LOW |
Bowling
| Banks Field, Vinor | T20 | 78 | 82 | 1 | 6.3 | 82.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 16 | 119 | 178 | 8.5 | 66.9 | 2.8 | 54.5 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 104 | 102 | 5 | 5.9 | 20.4 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 10 | 64 | 85 | 9.1 | 75.3 | 3.5 | 49.4 | LOW |
| powerplay | T20 | 3 | 22 | 53 | 11.0 | 41.5 | 1.9 | 67.9 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 7 | 33 | 40 | 6.6 | 82.5 | 2.5 | 47.5 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 50 | 46 | 4 | 5.5 | 11.5 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 36 | 37 | 1 | 6.2 | 37.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 14 | 69 | 109 | 9.9 | 63.3 | 2.8 | 56.0 | LOW |
| SPIN | T20 | 6 | 18 | 35 | 4.5 | 51.4 | 0.0 | 65.7 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 7 | 32 | 34 | 10.7 | 94.1 | 5.9 | 38.2 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.