NH Patel betting stats, splits & projections
All-rounder
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 53 | 662 | 741 | 15.8 | 89.3 | 7.7 | 42.1 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 1254 | 1294 | 62 | 6.2 | 20.9 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where NH Patel scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Canterbury (T20)MEDIUM sample
207 runs off 209 balls in 12 T20 matches — strike rate 99.0 vs 89.3 overall, average 25.9 vs 15.8 overall.
- Opposition: Otago (T20)MEDIUM sample
121 runs off 122 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 99.2 vs 89.3 overall, average 17.3 vs 15.8 overall.
- Venue: Hagley Oval, Christchurch (T20)MEDIUM sample
174 runs off 162 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 107.4 vs 89.3 overall, average 34.8 vs 15.8 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)MEDIUM sample
204 runs off 202 balls in 28 T20 matches — strike rate 101.0 vs 89.3 overall, average 12.0 vs 15.8 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Venue: Bay Oval, Mount Maunganui (T20)MEDIUM sample
101 runs off 125 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 80.8 vs 89.3 overall, average 14.4 vs 15.8 overall.
- Opposition: Central Districts (T20)LOW sample
52 runs off 82 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 63.4 vs 89.3 overall, average 6.5 vs 15.8 overall.
- Venue: Basin Reserve, Wellington (T20)LOW sample
53 runs off 67 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 79.1 vs 89.3 overall, average 17.7 vs 15.8 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample
68 runs off 86 balls in 14 T20 matches — strike rate 79.1 vs 89.3 overall, average 17.0 vs 15.8 overall.
Current projections
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Canterbury | T20 | 12 | 207 | 209 | 25.9 | 99.0 | 8.1 | 34.9 | MEDIUM |
| Auckland | T20 | 11 | 160 | 176 | 16.0 | 90.9 | 8.0 | 42.6 | MEDIUM |
| Wellington | T20 | 11 | 120 | 147 | 15.0 | 81.6 | 6.8 | 45.6 | MEDIUM |
| Otago | T20 | 9 | 121 | 122 | 17.3 | 99.2 | 9.8 | 36.9 | MEDIUM |
| Central Districts | T20 | 9 | 52 | 82 | 6.5 | 63.4 | 4.9 | 59.8 | LOW |
Bowling
| Wellington | T20 | 240 | 278 | 13 | 7.0 | 21.4 | MEDIUM |
| Otago | T20 | 216 | 240 | 10 | 6.7 | 24.0 | MEDIUM |
| Auckland | T20 | 198 | 199 | 10 | 6.0 | 19.9 | MEDIUM |
| Canterbury | T20 | 198 | 186 | 11 | 5.6 | 16.9 | MEDIUM |
| Central Districts | T20 | 174 | 181 | 5 | 6.2 | 36.2 | MEDIUM |
| Zimbabwe | T20 | 72 | 39 | 5 | 3.3 | 7.8 | LOW |
| England | T20 | 54 | 54 | 4 | 6.0 | 13.5 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Hagley Oval, Christchurch | T20 | 6 | 174 | 162 | 34.8 | 107.4 | 8.0 | 30.2 | MEDIUM |
| Seddon Park, Hamilton | T20 | 12 | 132 | 156 | 12.0 | 84.6 | 9.0 | 46.8 | MEDIUM |
| Bay Oval, Mount Maunganui | T20 | 9 | 101 | 125 | 14.4 | 80.8 | 8.0 | 52.0 | MEDIUM |
| Basin Reserve, Wellington | T20 | 5 | 53 | 67 | 17.7 | 79.1 | 6.0 | 44.8 | LOW |
| Eden Park Outer Oval, Auckland | T20 | 3 | 36 | 41 | 12.0 | 87.8 | 4.9 | 41.5 | LOW |
| John Davies Oval, Queenstown | T20 | 1 | 25 | 31 | 25.0 | 80.6 | 3.2 | 29.0 | LOW |
| University Oval, Dunedin | T20 | 3 | 36 | 30 | 18.0 | 120.0 | 16.7 | 36.7 | LOW |
Bowling
| Seddon Park, Hamilton | T20 | 258 | 227 | 13 | 5.3 | 17.5 | MEDIUM |
| Bay Oval, Mount Maunganui | T20 | 210 | 235 | 9 | 6.7 | 26.1 | MEDIUM |
| Basin Reserve, Wellington | T20 | 132 | 153 | 9 | 7.0 | 17.0 | LOW |
| Hagley Oval, Christchurch | T20 | 126 | 114 | 7 | 5.4 | 16.3 | LOW |
| University Oval, Dunedin | T20 | 66 | 71 | 6 | 6.5 | 11.8 | LOW |
| Eden Park Outer Oval, Auckland | T20 | 54 | 54 | 2 | 6.0 | 27.0 | LOW |
| The Rose Bowl, Southampton | T20 | 54 | 74 | 2 | 8.2 | 37.0 | LOW |
| Seddon Park | T20 | 42 | 36 | 0 | 5.1 | — | LOW |
| Bay Oval | T20 | 36 | 34 | 1 | 5.7 | 34.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 53 | 662 | 741 | 15.8 | 89.3 | 7.7 | 42.1 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 1254 | 1294 | 62 | 6.2 | 20.9 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 39 | 374 | 443 | 18.7 | 84.4 | 6.5 | 42.4 | HIGH |
| death | T20 | 28 | 204 | 202 | 12.0 | 101.0 | 9.4 | 35.6 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 13 | 84 | 96 | 16.8 | 87.5 | 9.4 | 54.2 | LOW |
Bowling
| middle | T20 | 624 | 637 | 28 | 6.1 | 22.8 | HIGH |
| powerplay | T20 | 408 | 403 | 20 | 5.9 | 20.1 | HIGH |
| death | T20 | 222 | 254 | 14 | 6.9 | 18.1 | MEDIUM |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 44 | 433 | 479 | 16.0 | 90.4 | 7.3 | 38.8 | HIGH |
| PACE | T20 | 33 | 161 | 176 | 14.6 | 91.5 | 9.1 | 45.5 | MEDIUM |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 14 | 68 | 86 | 17.0 | 79.1 | 7.0 | 53.5 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.