Niv Nagavkar betting stats, splits & projections
Bowler
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 16 | 323 | 295 | 23.1 | 109.5 | 10.2 | 34.6 | MEDIUM |
| overall | T20 | 306 | 408 | 10 | 8.0 | 40.8 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where Niv Nagavkar scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Venue: Tikkurila Cricket Ground (T20)LOW sample
84 runs off 71 balls in 3 T20 matches — strike rate 118.3 vs 109.5 overall, average 28.0 vs 23.1 overall.
- Venue: Kerava National Cricket Ground (T20)LOW sample
84 runs off 63 balls in 2 T20 matches — strike rate 133.3 vs 109.5 overall, average 84.0 vs 23.1 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)LOW sample
140 runs off 116 balls in 14 T20 matches — strike rate 120.7 vs 109.5 overall, average 140.0 vs 23.1 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)MEDIUM sample
122 runs off 124 balls in 13 T20 matches — strike rate 98.4 vs 109.5 overall, average 13.6 vs 23.1 overall.
- Venue: Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County (T20)LOW sample
59 runs off 75 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 78.7 vs 109.5 overall, average 14.8 vs 23.1 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Romania | T20 | 2 | 38 | 45 | 19.0 | 84.4 | 6.7 | 48.9 | LOW |
| Isle of Man | T20 | 1 | 42 | 44 | 42.0 | 95.5 | 4.5 | 34.1 | LOW |
| Czech Republic | T20 | 1 | 63 | 42 | — | 150.0 | 19.0 | 23.8 | LOW |
| Turkey | T20 | 1 | 37 | 33 | 37.0 | 112.1 | 12.1 | 30.3 | LOW |
Bowling
| Hungary | T20 | 44 | 55 | 1 | 7.5 | 55.0 | LOW |
| Portugal | T20 | 42 | 50 | 0 | 7.1 | — | LOW |
| Romania | T20 | 42 | 52 | 2 | 7.4 | 26.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 4 | 59 | 75 | 14.8 | 78.7 | 6.7 | 44.0 | LOW |
| Tikkurila Cricket Ground | T20 | 3 | 84 | 71 | 28.0 | 118.3 | 8.5 | 28.2 | LOW |
| Kerava National Cricket Ground | T20 | 2 | 84 | 63 | 84.0 | 133.3 | 15.9 | 30.2 | LOW |
| Simar Cricket Ground, Rome | T20 | 2 | 44 | 36 | 22.0 | 122.2 | 8.3 | 27.8 | LOW |
| Roma Cricket Ground | T20 | 3 | 41 | 33 | 13.7 | 124.2 | 18.2 | 39.4 | LOW |
Bowling
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 72 | 117 | 1 | 9.8 | 117.0 | LOW |
| Roma Cricket Ground | T20 | 60 | 74 | 3 | 7.4 | 24.7 | LOW |
| Simar Cricket Ground, Rome | T20 | 44 | 46 | 2 | 6.3 | 23.0 | LOW |
| Tikkurila Cricket Ground | T20 | 42 | 47 | 1 | 6.7 | 47.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 16 | 323 | 295 | 23.1 | 109.5 | 10.2 | 34.6 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 306 | 408 | 10 | 8.0 | 40.8 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | T20 | 14 | 194 | 169 | 17.6 | 114.8 | 13.0 | 37.3 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 8 | 97 | 95 | 97.0 | 102.1 | 7.4 | 32.6 | LOW |
| death | T20 | 4 | 32 | 31 | 16.0 | 103.2 | 3.2 | 25.8 | LOW |
Bowling
| powerplay | T20 | 192 | 221 | 3 | 6.9 | 73.7 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 90 | 153 | 6 | 10.2 | 25.5 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 13 | 122 | 124 | 13.6 | 98.4 | 8.1 | 39.5 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | T20 | 14 | 140 | 116 | 140.0 | 120.7 | 12.9 | 31.0 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 7 | 61 | 55 | 15.3 | 110.9 | 9.1 | 30.9 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.