Noman Amjad betting stats, splits & projections
Bowler
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 33 | 353 | 317 | 16.0 | 111.4 | 10.1 | 34.7 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 693 | 800 | 26 | 6.9 | 30.8 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where Noman Amjad scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)MEDIUM sample
205 runs off 168 balls in 30 T20 matches — strike rate 122.0 vs 111.4 overall, average 15.8 vs 16.0 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)MEDIUM sample
163 runs off 135 balls in 21 T20 matches — strike rate 120.7 vs 111.4 overall, average 14.8 vs 16.0 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
134 runs off 125 balls in 13 T20 matches — strike rate 107.2 vs 111.4 overall, average 26.8 vs 16.0 overall.
- Venue: Marsa Sports Club (T20)LOW sample
79 runs off 61 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 129.5 vs 111.4 overall, average 26.3 vs 16.0 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)LOW sample
83 runs off 63 balls in 11 T20 matches — strike rate 131.7 vs 111.4 overall, average 16.6 vs 16.0 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)LOW sample
65 runs off 86 balls in 15 T20 matches — strike rate 75.6 vs 111.4 overall, average 16.3 vs 16.0 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Switzerland | T20 | 3 | 46 | 43 | 46.0 | 107.0 | 7.0 | 34.9 | LOW |
| Norway | T20 | 5 | 26 | 41 | 5.2 | 63.4 | 4.9 | 53.7 | LOW |
| Croatia | T20 | 1 | 52 | 40 | — | 130.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 | LOW |
| Malta | T20 | 4 | 55 | 39 | 27.5 | 141.0 | 12.8 | 23.1 | LOW |
Bowling
| Norway | T20 | 90 | 105 | 4 | 7.0 | 26.3 | LOW |
| Portugal | T20 | 84 | 101 | 1 | 7.2 | 101.0 | LOW |
| Switzerland | T20 | 66 | 86 | 4 | 7.8 | 21.5 | LOW |
| Romania | T20 | 60 | 74 | 2 | 7.4 | 37.0 | LOW |
| Luxembourg | T20 | 59 | 56 | 4 | 5.7 | 14.0 | LOW |
| Belgium | T20 | 54 | 55 | 1 | 6.1 | 55.0 | LOW |
| Malta | T20 | 42 | 59 | 1 | 8.4 | 59.0 | LOW |
| Turkey | T20 | 42 | 27 | 2 | 3.9 | 13.5 | LOW |
| Austria | T20 | 36 | 44 | 3 | 7.3 | 14.7 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Marsa Sports Club | T20 | 7 | 79 | 61 | 26.3 | 129.5 | 11.5 | 27.9 | LOW |
| Kerava National Cricket Ground | T20 | 3 | 60 | 51 | 20.0 | 117.6 | 9.8 | 29.4 | LOW |
| Santarem Cricket Ground | T20 | 7 | 41 | 44 | 5.9 | 93.2 | 11.4 | 47.7 | LOW |
| Happy Valley Ground 2 | T20 | 1 | 52 | 40 | — | 130.0 | 15.0 | 25.0 | LOW |
| Happy Valley Ground | T20 | 3 | 29 | 30 | 14.5 | 96.7 | 10.0 | 46.7 | LOW |
Bowling
| Marsa Sports Club | T20 | 131 | 154 | 6 | 7.1 | 25.7 | LOW |
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 126 | 120 | 7 | 5.7 | 17.1 | LOW |
| Santarem Cricket Ground | T20 | 126 | 148 | 2 | 7.0 | 74.0 | LOW |
| Kerava National Cricket Ground | T20 | 72 | 78 | 6 | 6.5 | 13.0 | LOW |
| Botkyrka Cricket Center, Stockholm | T20 | 60 | 91 | 0 | 9.1 | — | LOW |
| Dreux Sport Cricket Club | T20 | 54 | 55 | 1 | 6.1 | 55.0 | LOW |
| Happy Valley Ground | T20 | 48 | 72 | 2 | 9.0 | 36.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 33 | 353 | 317 | 16.0 | 111.4 | 10.1 | 34.7 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 693 | 800 | 26 | 6.9 | 30.8 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| death | T20 | 21 | 163 | 135 | 14.8 | 120.7 | 8.1 | 29.6 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 13 | 134 | 125 | 26.8 | 107.2 | 9.6 | 32.0 | MEDIUM |
| powerplay | T20 | 9 | 56 | 57 | 9.3 | 98.2 | 15.8 | 52.6 | LOW |
Bowling
| powerplay | T20 | 369 | 451 | 8 | 7.3 | 56.4 | HIGH |
| death | T20 | 162 | 202 | 10 | 7.5 | 20.2 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 162 | 147 | 8 | 5.4 | 18.4 | MEDIUM |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 30 | 205 | 168 | 15.8 | 122.0 | 12.5 | 34.5 | MEDIUM |
| SPIN | T20 | 15 | 65 | 86 | 16.3 | 75.6 | 3.5 | 41.9 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 11 | 83 | 63 | 16.6 | 131.7 | 12.7 | 25.4 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.