NRJ Croes betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | ODI | 15 | 244 | 354 | 22.2 | 68.9 | 5.4 | 55.6 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 15 | 228 | 172 | 28.5 | 132.6 | 13.4 | 22.1 | MEDIUM |
Why we like it
Splits where NRJ Croes scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Bowling type: SPIN (ODI)MEDIUM sample
131 runs off 183 balls in 13 ODI matches — strike rate 71.6 vs 68.9 overall, average 32.8 vs 22.2 overall.
- Phase: middle (ODI)MEDIUM sample
183 runs off 272 balls in 11 ODI matches — strike rate 67.3 vs 68.9 overall, average 30.5 vs 22.2 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)LOW sample
123 runs off 78 balls in 12 T20 matches — strike rate 157.7 vs 132.6 overall, average 41.0 vs 28.5 overall.
- Phase: death (T20)LOW sample
146 runs off 86 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 169.8 vs 132.6 overall, average 48.7 vs 28.5 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Opposition: Oman (ODI)LOW sample
48 runs off 87 balls in 2 ODI matches — strike rate 55.2 vs 68.9 overall, average 24.0 vs 22.2 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (ODI)LOW sample
75 runs off 109 balls in 12 ODI matches — strike rate 68.8 vs 68.9 overall, average 12.5 vs 22.2 overall.
- Bowling type: SPIN (T20)LOW sample
74 runs off 68 balls in 11 T20 matches — strike rate 108.8 vs 132.6 overall, average 18.5 vs 28.5 overall.
- Phase: middle (T20)LOW sample
77 runs off 83 balls in 11 T20 matches — strike rate 92.8 vs 132.6 overall, average 15.4 vs 28.5 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Oman | ODI | 2 | 48 | 87 | 24.0 | 55.2 | 1.1 | 60.9 | LOW |
| Canada | ODI | 2 | 37 | 59 | 18.5 | 62.7 | 5.1 | 57.6 | LOW |
| Namibia | ODI | 1 | 46 | 56 | — | 82.1 | 5.4 | 46.4 | LOW |
| United Arab Emirates | ODI | 4 | 40 | 53 | 13.3 | 75.5 | 5.7 | 50.9 | LOW |
| Oman | T20 | 3 | 76 | 49 | 76.0 | 155.1 | 18.4 | 14.3 | LOW |
| Scotland | T20 | 3 | 63 | 45 | 31.5 | 140.0 | 6.7 | 13.3 | LOW |
| Scotland | ODI | 2 | 23 | 35 | 11.5 | 65.7 | 5.7 | 60.0 | LOW |
| United States of America | ODI | 2 | 31 | 34 | 31.0 | 91.2 | 14.7 | 52.9 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Al Amerat Cricket Ground Oman Cricket (Ministry Turf 1) | ODI | 4 | 74 | 121 | 18.5 | 61.2 | 2.5 | 57.0 | MEDIUM |
| Tribhuvan University International Cricket Ground, Kirtipur | ODI | 2 | 58 | 80 | — | 72.5 | 5.0 | 51.2 | LOW |
| Hazelaarweg, Rotterdam | ODI | 2 | 58 | 77 | 29.0 | 75.3 | 9.1 | 53.2 | LOW |
| Sportpark Maarschalkerweerd, Utrecht | ODI | 2 | 32 | 49 | 32.0 | 65.3 | 6.1 | 61.2 | LOW |
| Al Amerat Cricket Ground Oman Cricket (Ministry Turf 1) | T20 | 3 | 76 | 49 | 76.0 | 155.1 | 18.4 | 14.3 | LOW |
| Sportpark Westvliet, Voorburg | T20 | 1 | 52 | 35 | — | 148.6 | 5.7 | 8.6 | LOW |
| Sportpark Maarschalkerweerd, Utrecht | T20 | 2 | 39 | 32 | 39.0 | 121.9 | 12.5 | 31.3 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | ODI | 14 | 237 | 348 | 23.7 | 68.1 | 5.2 | 55.7 | HIGH |
| Unknown | T20 | 15 | 228 | 172 | 28.5 | 132.6 | 13.4 | 22.1 | MEDIUM |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| middle | ODI | 11 | 183 | 272 | 30.5 | 67.3 | 5.9 | 57.0 | MEDIUM |
| death | T20 | 8 | 146 | 86 | 48.7 | 169.8 | 20.9 | 12.8 | LOW |
| middle | T20 | 11 | 77 | 83 | 15.4 | 92.8 | 4.8 | 31.3 | LOW |
| death | ODI | 5 | 40 | 42 | 10.0 | 95.2 | 4.8 | 33.3 | LOW |
| powerplay | ODI | 4 | 21 | 40 | 21.0 | 52.5 | 2.5 | 70.0 | LOW |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | ODI | 13 | 131 | 183 | 32.8 | 71.6 | 4.4 | 53.0 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | ODI | 12 | 75 | 109 | 12.5 | 68.8 | 7.3 | 58.7 | LOW |
| PACE | T20 | 12 | 123 | 78 | 41.0 | 157.7 | 17.9 | 12.8 | LOW |
| SPIN | T20 | 11 | 74 | 68 | 18.5 | 108.8 | 7.4 | 27.9 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | ODI | 6 | 38 | 62 | 38.0 | 61.3 | 4.8 | 58.1 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.