NT Miles betting stats, splits & projections
Batter
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 78 | 1691 | 1891 | 29.2 | 89.4 | 9.6 | 47.2 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where NT Miles scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Venue: Mission Road Ground, Mong Kok, Hong Kong (T20)HIGH sample
292 runs off 341 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 85.6 vs 89.4 overall, average 41.7 vs 29.2 overall.
- Bowling type: UNKNOWN (T20)HIGH sample
303 runs off 338 balls in 28 T20 matches — strike rate 89.6 vs 89.4 overall, average 43.3 vs 29.2 overall.
- Opposition: Malaysia (T20)MEDIUM sample
294 runs off 281 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 104.6 vs 89.4 overall, average 58.8 vs 29.2 overall.
- Opposition: China (T20)MEDIUM sample
215 runs off 252 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 85.3 vs 89.4 overall, average 43.0 vs 29.2 overall.
- Opposition: Japan (T20)MEDIUM sample
252 runs off 247 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 102.0 vs 89.4 overall, average 42.0 vs 29.2 overall.
- Venue: Gelephu International Cricket Ground (T20)MEDIUM sample
241 runs off 190 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 126.8 vs 89.4 overall, average 120.5 vs 29.2 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: powerplay (T20)HIGH sample
803 runs off 1019 balls in 75 T20 matches — strike rate 78.8 vs 89.4 overall, average 27.7 vs 29.2 overall.
- Opposition: Nepal (T20)MEDIUM sample
116 runs off 145 balls in 8 T20 matches — strike rate 80.0 vs 89.4 overall, average 29.0 vs 29.2 overall.
- Opposition: Uganda (T20)MEDIUM sample
91 runs off 122 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 74.6 vs 89.4 overall, average 22.8 vs 29.2 overall.
- Venue: Entebbe Cricket Oval (T20)MEDIUM sample
124 runs off 171 balls in 6 T20 matches — strike rate 72.5 vs 89.4 overall, average 31.0 vs 29.2 overall.
- Opposition: Namibia (T20)LOW sample
78 runs off 100 balls in 4 T20 matches — strike rate 78.0 vs 89.4 overall, average 26.0 vs 29.2 overall.
- Opposition: United Arab Emirates (T20)LOW sample
71 runs off 90 balls in 9 T20 matches — strike rate 78.9 vs 89.4 overall, average 7.9 vs 29.2 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Malaysia | T20 | 7 | 294 | 281 | 58.8 | 104.6 | 12.1 | 41.6 | MEDIUM |
| China | T20 | 6 | 215 | 252 | 43.0 | 85.3 | 9.1 | 48.8 | MEDIUM |
| Japan | T20 | 9 | 252 | 247 | 42.0 | 102.0 | 11.3 | 44.5 | MEDIUM |
| Tanzania | T20 | 5 | 212 | 221 | 70.7 | 95.9 | 9.0 | 41.2 | MEDIUM |
| Nepal | T20 | 8 | 116 | 145 | 29.0 | 80.0 | 8.3 | 51.0 | MEDIUM |
| Uganda | T20 | 5 | 91 | 122 | 22.8 | 74.6 | 8.2 | 53.3 | MEDIUM |
| Namibia | T20 | 4 | 78 | 100 | 26.0 | 78.0 | 8.0 | 52.0 | LOW |
| Bhutan | T20 | 4 | 98 | 96 | 32.7 | 102.1 | 14.6 | 43.8 | LOW |
| United Arab Emirates | T20 | 9 | 71 | 90 | 7.9 | 78.9 | 7.8 | 48.9 | LOW |
| Kuwait | T20 | 4 | 59 | 82 | 19.7 | 72.0 | 4.9 | 52.4 | LOW |
| Netherlands | T20 | 4 | 86 | 78 | 21.5 | 110.3 | 14.1 | 41.0 | LOW |
| Thailand | T20 | 5 | 19 | 47 | 3.8 | 40.4 | 2.1 | 66.0 | LOW |
| South Korea | T20 | 1 | 31 | 37 | 31.0 | 83.8 | 8.1 | 56.8 | LOW |
| Myanmar | T20 | 1 | 28 | 34 | — | 82.4 | 8.8 | 52.9 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Mission Road Ground, Mong Kok, Hong Kong | T20 | 8 | 292 | 341 | 41.7 | 85.6 | 7.9 | 44.3 | HIGH |
| Gelephu International Cricket Ground | T20 | 5 | 241 | 190 | 120.5 | 126.8 | 18.9 | 38.4 | MEDIUM |
| Entebbe Cricket Oval | T20 | 6 | 124 | 171 | 31.0 | 72.5 | 5.3 | 49.7 | MEDIUM |
| Hong Kong Cricket Club | T20 | 4 | 112 | 131 | 112.0 | 85.5 | 9.2 | 43.5 | MEDIUM |
| Kaizuka Cricket Ground | T20 | 4 | 150 | 129 | 75.0 | 116.3 | 14.0 | 41.1 | MEDIUM |
| Namibia Cricket Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 4 | 123 | 129 | 41.0 | 95.3 | 8.5 | 41.1 | MEDIUM |
| High Performance Oval, Windhoek | T20 | 3 | 106 | 103 | 35.3 | 102.9 | 14.6 | 49.5 | LOW |
| Bayuemas Oval, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 9 | 73 | 87 | 9.1 | 83.9 | 10.3 | 54.0 | LOW |
| Yeonhui Cricket Ground, Incheon | T20 | 3 | 57 | 83 | 19.0 | 68.7 | 7.2 | 62.7 | LOW |
| UKM-YSD Cricket Oval, Bangi | T20 | 3 | 59 | 79 | 29.5 | 74.7 | 6.3 | 51.9 | LOW |
| Sportpark Maarschalkerweerd, Utrecht | T20 | 4 | 86 | 78 | 21.5 | 110.3 | 14.1 | 41.0 | LOW |
| Kinrara Academy Oval, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 3 | 54 | 62 | 54.0 | 87.1 | 8.1 | 45.2 | LOW |
| Selangor Turf Club, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 2 | 37 | 51 | 18.5 | 72.5 | 7.8 | 60.8 | LOW |
| Sano International Cricket Ground | T20 | 3 | 57 | 48 | 28.5 | 118.8 | 10.4 | 35.4 | LOW |
| Kolej Tuanku Jaafar Cricket Oval, Mantin | T20 | 3 | 26 | 45 | 26.0 | 57.8 | 6.7 | 64.4 | LOW |
| United Cricket Club Ground, Windhoek | T20 | 3 | 33 | 40 | 11.0 | 82.5 | 5.0 | 40.0 | LOW |
| Terdthai Cricket Ground, Bangkok | T20 | 3 | 10 | 32 | 5.0 | 31.3 | 0.0 | 68.8 | LOW |
| Dubai International Cricket Stadium | T20 | 2 | 16 | 31 | 8.0 | 51.6 | 3.2 | 58.1 | LOW |
| YSD-UKM Cricket Oval, Bangi | T20 | 1 | 24 | 31 | 24.0 | 77.4 | 6.5 | 48.4 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 75 | 1634 | 1843 | 29.2 | 88.7 | 9.5 | 47.5 | HIGH |
| Japan | T20 | 3 | 57 | 48 | 28.5 | 118.8 | 10.4 | 35.4 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| powerplay | T20 | 75 | 803 | 1019 | 27.7 | 78.8 | 9.2 | 54.7 | HIGH |
| middle | T20 | 44 | 684 | 720 | 32.6 | 95.0 | 8.8 | 39.3 | HIGH |
| death | T20 | 15 | 204 | 152 | 25.5 | 134.2 | 15.8 | 34.2 | MEDIUM |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| PACE | T20 | 74 | 698 | 831 | 31.7 | 84.0 | 9.7 | 51.5 | HIGH |
| SPIN | T20 | 59 | 690 | 722 | 23.8 | 95.6 | 9.7 | 42.9 | HIGH |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 28 | 303 | 338 | 43.3 | 89.6 | 8.9 | 45.6 | HIGH |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.