Nur Dania Syuhada betting stats, splits & projections
Bowler
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 35 | 201 | 345 | 8.0 | 58.3 | 3.5 | 55.7 | HIGH |
| overall | T20 | 1318 | 1119 | 51 | 5.1 | 21.9 | HIGH |
Why we like it
Splits where Nur Dania Syuhada scores materially faster or lasts materially longer than their own baseline in the same format.
- Opposition: Hong Kong (T20)LOW sample
74 runs off 101 balls in 7 T20 matches — strike rate 73.3 vs 58.3 overall, average 18.5 vs 8.0 overall.
- Venue: Bayuemas Oval, Kuala Lumpur (T20)LOW sample
74 runs off 110 balls in 14 T20 matches — strike rate 67.3 vs 58.3 overall, average 7.4 vs 8.0 overall.
- Venue: Gelephu International Cricket Ground (T20)LOW sample
52 runs off 72 balls in 5 T20 matches — strike rate 72.2 vs 58.3 overall, average 10.4 vs 8.0 overall.
- Bowling type: PACE (T20)LOW sample
69 runs off 92 balls in 21 T20 matches — strike rate 75.0 vs 58.3 overall, average 6.9 vs 8.0 overall.
Risks
Splits pointing the other way — the conditions and opponents where the record is worse than usual.
- Phase: middle (T20)MEDIUM sample
63 runs off 130 balls in 17 T20 matches — strike rate 48.5 vs 58.3 overall, average 6.3 vs 8.0 overall.
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
| Hong Kong | T20 | 7 | 74 | 101 | 18.5 | 73.3 | 5.9 | 46.5 | LOW |
| Nepal | T20 | 8 | 42 | 54 | 6.0 | 77.8 | 7.4 | 51.9 | LOW |
| Bhutan | T20 | 3 | 20 | 41 | 6.7 | 48.8 | 2.4 | 63.4 | LOW |
| Thailand | T20 | 4 | 12 | 36 | 3.0 | 33.3 | 0.0 | 69.4 | LOW |
| United Arab Emirates | T20 | 2 | 19 | 36 | — | 52.8 | 0.0 | 50.0 | LOW |
| China | T20 | 2 | 18 | 30 | 9.0 | 60.0 | 3.3 | 46.7 | LOW |
Bowling
| Nepal | T20 | 312 | 266 | 12 | 5.1 | 22.2 | MEDIUM |
| Hong Kong | T20 | 167 | 184 | 4 | 6.6 | 46.0 | MEDIUM |
| Singapore | T20 | 96 | 55 | 7 | 3.4 | 7.9 | LOW |
| Thailand | T20 | 90 | 88 | 2 | 5.9 | 44.0 | LOW |
| United Arab Emirates | T20 | 90 | 85 | 0 | 5.7 | — | LOW |
| Bhutan | T20 | 84 | 61 | 5 | 4.4 | 12.2 | LOW |
| Kuwait | T20 | 72 | 45 | 5 | 3.8 | 9.0 | LOW |
| Qatar | T20 | 72 | 35 | 5 | 2.9 | 7.0 | LOW |
| Indonesia | T20 | 60 | 46 | 1 | 4.6 | 46.0 | LOW |
| Namibia | T20 | 48 | 29 | 2 | 3.6 | 14.5 | LOW |
| China | T20 | 46 | 31 | 2 | 4.0 | 15.5 | LOW |
| Sri Lanka | T20 | 36 | 44 | 1 | 7.3 | 44.0 | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
| Bayuemas Oval, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 14 | 74 | 110 | 7.4 | 67.3 | 3.6 | 46.4 | LOW |
| Mission Road Ground, Mong Kok, Hong Kong | T20 | 5 | 49 | 79 | 16.3 | 62.0 | 2.5 | 48.1 | LOW |
| Gelephu International Cricket Ground | T20 | 5 | 52 | 72 | 10.4 | 72.2 | 8.3 | 55.6 | LOW |
Bowling
| Bayuemas Oval, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 457 | 356 | 17 | 4.7 | 20.9 | HIGH |
| Kinrara Academy Oval, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 120 | 102 | 4 | 5.1 | 25.5 | LOW |
| Terdthai Cricket Ground, Bangkok | T20 | 120 | 95 | 5 | 4.8 | 19.0 | LOW |
| Mission Road Ground, Mong Kok, Hong Kong | T20 | 118 | 107 | 3 | 5.4 | 35.7 | LOW |
| Gelephu International Cricket Ground | T20 | 107 | 118 | 3 | 6.6 | 39.3 | LOW |
| Selangor Turf Club, Kuala Lumpur | T20 | 96 | 57 | 6 | 3.6 | 9.5 | LOW |
| YSD-UKM Cricket Oval, Bangi | T20 | 66 | 55 | 1 | 5.0 | 55.0 | LOW |
| Indian Association Ground, Singapore | T20 | 60 | 38 | 5 | 3.8 | 7.6 | LOW |
| Johor Cricket Academy Oval | T20 | 48 | 30 | 3 | 3.8 | 10.0 | LOW |
| UKM-YSD Cricket Oval, Bangi | T20 | 42 | 28 | 2 | 4.0 | 14.0 | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
| Unknown | T20 | 35 | 201 | 345 | 8.0 | 58.3 | 3.5 | 55.7 | HIGH |
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 1318 | 1119 | 51 | 5.1 | 21.9 | HIGH |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
| death | T20 | 23 | 131 | 203 | 10.1 | 64.5 | 3.4 | 50.7 | MEDIUM |
| middle | T20 | 17 | 63 | 130 | 6.3 | 48.5 | 3.1 | 62.3 | MEDIUM |
Bowling
| powerplay | T20 | 610 | 458 | 24 | 4.5 | 19.1 | HIGH |
| middle | T20 | 462 | 382 | 18 | 5.0 | 21.2 | HIGH |
| death | T20 | 246 | 279 | 9 | 6.8 | 31.0 | MEDIUM |
Against pace and spin
Record against each bowling type faced, rolled up when a finer category has too few balls.
| SPIN | T20 | 29 | 105 | 199 | 8.1 | 52.8 | 2.5 | 59.3 | MEDIUM |
| PACE | T20 | 21 | 69 | 92 | 6.9 | 75.0 | 6.5 | 48.9 | LOW |
| UNKNOWN | T20 | 11 | 27 | 54 | 13.5 | 50.0 | 1.9 | 53.7 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.