O Duff betting stats, splits & projections
Every figure below is counted from stored ball-by-ball deliveries — no estimates, no averages copied from elsewhere. Splits with fewer balls behind them are marked LOW sample and carry less weight in the model.
Record by format
Formats are never pooled: a twenty-over record tells you nothing about fifty-over scoring, so they are modelled and shown separately.
| overall | T20 | 4 | 3 | 15 | 1.0 | 20.0 | 0.0 | 93.3 | LOW |
| overall | T20 | 147 | 244 | 6 | 10.0 | 40.7 | LOW |
Against each opponent
Head-to-head record by format. Small head-to-head samples move the model very little — read the sample column before leaning on a line here.
Bowling
| Romania | T20 | 48 | 76 | 0 | 9.5 | — | LOW |
By venue
Ground-by-ground record. Venue effects are real but slow to prove, so grounds with few balls are shown for transparency rather than used as evidence.
Bowling
| Tikkurila Cricket Ground | T20 | 53 | 94 | 2 | 10.6 | 47.0 | LOW |
| Moara Vlasiei Cricket Ground, Ilfov County | T20 | 48 | 76 | 0 | 9.5 | — | LOW |
By country
Conditions vary more by country than by ground; this is the broader pitch-and-conditions view.
Bowling
| Unknown | T20 | 147 | 244 | 6 | 10.0 | 40.7 | LOW |
By match phase
Powerplay, middle overs and death. Phase splits drive the simulated scoring rate ball by ball.
Bowling
| powerplay | T20 | 65 | 125 | 0 | 11.5 | — | LOW |
| middle | T20 | 52 | 73 | 4 | 8.4 | 18.3 | LOW |
How these splits are used
The same aggregates feed the ball-by-ball simulation behind every projection: format baselines, phase scoring rates, the bowling types a batter will face and the expected attack. See the current match projections on the cricket betting hub and the model's tested record on the cricket model performance page.